是谁先弥补了“积淀说”之不足

发布时间：2018-05-15 19:52

本文选题：积淀说 + 社会心理结构　；参考：《学术月刊》1994年07期

【摘要】：正《学术月刊》编辑部: 尊刊1993年第5期发表的陈炎《试论“积淀说”与“突破说”》一文(以下简称陈文),为《新华文摘》所转载,影响甚大。阅毕此文发现,该文虽然论述严谨,但在史实方面却有所疏漏。特在此提出若干补证。陈文在论述了李泽厚的“积淀说”之后指出:“当李泽厚赢得了广泛的赞誉乃至崇拜之时,刘晓波却开拓了自己的‘背叛’”(指提出“突破说”),又说,“从严格的理论意义上讲,刘晓波并不是进行这种‘背叛’的‘第一个人’”。根据我所掌握的资料,在刘晓波1986年7月提出“突破说”之前的4年中,已有一些学者直接地、明确地对李泽厚的“积淀说”提出了批评,并且提出了“刚好弥补了积淀说之不足”的系统的理论学说。
[Abstract]:Editorial Department of "academic monthly": Chen Yan, published in the 5th issue of the Journal in 1993, "on the Theory of accumulation" and "the Theory of Breakthrough" (hereinafter referred to as "Chen Wenwei", reproduced by "Xinhua Abstracts"), has a great influence. After reading this article found that although the article is rigorous, but in the historical facts, there are some omissions. Here are some additional proofs. After discussing Li Zehou's "accumulation theory," Chen Wen pointed out: "while Li Zehou has won widespread praise and even worship, Liu Xiaobo has opened up his own 'betrayal'." In a strictly theoretical sense, Liu Xiaobo is not the first person to commit such betrayal. According to the information I have, in the four years before Liu Xiaobo put forward the "breakthrough theory" in July 1986, some scholars have criticized Li Zehou's "accumulation theory" directly and explicitly. And put forward the system theory of "just make up the deficiency of accumulation theory".
【分类号】：B83-09

【相似文献】