中国美学史研究的观念更新及路径创新

发布时间：2018-05-25 14:14

本文选题：美学思想 + 中国古代　；参考：《学术月刊》2009年07期

【摘要】：新时期以来,中国美学史研究既取得了一系列成果,同时也存在着诸多不足。这表现为美学观念与美学史著述的脱节甚至矛盾;具象描述淹没理论思辨,缺少足够的哲学深度;大规模的独立著述少、集体著述有机性不够等等。重写中国美学史,就应以创新的观念和路径努力克服这些不足。首先对曾经流行的"美是人的本质力量的对象化"的美学定义及当下流行的非本质主义美学观的缺失作出甄别和纠正,重新考量"美"、"美学"概念的义界,确认"美是普遍愉快的对象"的美学观;其次对"中国古代美学精神"作出独特的把握,指出它们是一个以味为美、以意为美、以道为美、以文为美构成的互补系统;在此基础上,清晰地分析和揭示出中国美学史的演变轨迹和时代特征。
[Abstract]:Since the new era, Chinese aesthetic history research has not only made a series of achievements, but also has many shortcomings. This is manifested in the disconnection and even contradiction between aesthetic concepts and aesthetic history works; the concrete description inundates the theoretical thinking and lacks sufficient philosophical depth; the large scale independent works are few and the collective writings are not organic enough and so on. To rewrite the history of Chinese aesthetics, we should try our best to overcome these deficiencies with innovative ideas and paths. First of all, the aesthetic definition of "beauty is the objectification of human essential power" and the lack of popular non-essentialist aesthetic view are screened and corrected, and the meaning of the concepts of "beauty" and "aesthetics" is reconsidered. Secondly, it makes a unique grasp of the spirit of ancient Chinese aesthetics, pointing out that they are a complementary system composed of taste as beauty, meaning as beauty, Tao as beauty and literature as beauty. On this basis, the evolution of the history of Chinese aesthetics and characteristics of the times are clearly analyzed and revealed.
【作者单位】：上海财经大学国学研究所;
【分类号】：B83-092

【共引文献】