关于新实践美学原理的再思考——再答章辉先生

发布时间：2018-05-30 16:07

本文选题：新实践美学 + 本质主义　；参考：《湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2009年06期

【摘要】：章辉先生指责新实践美学对美和艺术的问题进行了"本质主义"的处理,把美的起源等同于美的本质,并且其美的定义"对象化的情感"亦并无新意,没有关注现代生存问题,此外还就审美超越和现象学的主客关系问题对新实践美学提出了质疑。实际上,章辉先生所说的"后实践美学"的一些基本概念如"生命"、"超越",以及从"审美活动"出发来建立美学体系,在"新实践美学"中其实都可以找到,问题只在于如何组合这些概念。本质主义不等于谬误,也不等于把起源混同于本质;"对象化的情感"这一美的定义的首创性是无容置疑的,它本身就涉及到了美学与现代生存状况的关系问题;"审美超越"并非章辉先生首次提出,章辉先生对他引以为自己的"生命美学"的"思想资源"的现象学、解释学美学、生命美学、存在美学等等都用割断思想的历史关联的办法来看待,里面充斥着误解。所以他对新实践美学的每一点批评都是不成立的。当然,目前的新实践美学体系仍然是一个极其粗略的框架,在此框架上还需要覆盖上丰满的血肉,还有有待发展和改进的地方。这除了我们自身的努力外,也欢迎一切立足于扎扎实实的学问根基和切切实实的审美体验之上的批评和质疑。
[Abstract]:Zhang Hui accused the New practical Aesthetics of dealing with the issue of beauty and art by "essentialism", equating the origin of beauty with the essence of beauty, and his definition of beauty as "objectified emotion" had no new meaning, nor did he pay attention to the problem of modern existence. In addition, the new practical aesthetics is questioned about the relationship between aesthetic transcendence and phenomenology. In fact, some of the basic concepts of "post-practical aesthetics", such as "life", "transcendence" and the establishment of aesthetic system from "aesthetic activities", mentioned by Zhang Hui, can actually be found in "New practical Aesthetics". The only question is how to combine these concepts. Essentialism does not mean fallacy, nor does it equate origin with essence; the originality of the aesthetic definition of "objectified emotion" is indisputable, It itself involves the relationship between aesthetics and modern living conditions. "Aesthetic transcendence" is not the first time that Zhang Hui has proposed that Zhang Hui's phenomenology and hermeneutic aesthetics of "thought resources" which he calls his "life aesthetics". Life aesthetics, existential aesthetics and so on are treated by the way of cutting off the historical connection of thought, which is full of misunderstandings. So every criticism of his new practical aesthetics is untenable. Of course, the current new practical aesthetic system is still a very rough framework, which also needs to cover the full flesh and blood, and there is still room for development and improvement. In addition to our own efforts, we also welcome all the criticism and doubt based on the solid foundation of learning and practical aesthetic experience.
【作者单位】：武汉大学哲学学院;
【分类号】：B83-06

【参考文献】