马尔库塞技术的审美救赎思想探究

发布时间：2019-06-06 12:05

【摘要】：赫伯特·马尔库塞(Herbert Marcuse,1879-1979)是社会批判理论的重要构建者和早期法兰克福学派代表人物之一。国内外的马尔库塞研究在“现代性”语境中再度升温,对其技术思想研究正在逐渐深入。论文从技术哲学的理论视野出发,聚焦于马尔库塞技术的审美救赎思想,旨在解读其技术理性批判之外建构维度的技术思想,以期丰富西方马克思主义代表人物的技术哲学研究。论文围绕马尔库塞“为什么要对技术进行救赎?”、“为什么选择技术的审美救赎路径?”、“技术的审美救赎方案是如何展开的?”以及“技术的审美救赎思想应如何评价?”四个环环相扣的问题展开,依次回答了技术的审美救赎思想的理论起点、生成缘由、逻辑展开和学术评价。首先,马尔库塞以对发达工业社会的总体性批判为理论主轴,将技术理性批判与意识形态批判相结合为最大特色,但因“技术理性决定论”的思维方式最终导致了“恶性循环”的理论困境。其次,论文从审美现代性的文化脉络、“后技术理性”的哲学源泉、美学还原路径的现实起因三个角度解读了其技术的审美救赎思想的生成缘由。再次,面对发达工业社会技术理性的全面控制这一病态,马尔库塞给出了以技术、自然和人性为建构对象,以“美学还原”为建构路径的审美救赎方案。最后,论文从限度和价值两个维度评价了马尔库塞技术的审美救赎思想,指出其学术传承路径为“批判继续,建构转向”。
[Abstract]:Herbert Marcuse (Herbert Marcuse,1879-1979) is an important architect of social critical theory and one of the representatives of the early Frankfurt School. Marcuse's research at home and abroad heats up again in the context of "modernization", and the study of his technical thought is gradually deepening. From the theoretical perspective of philosophy of technology, this paper focuses on Marcuse's thought of aesthetic redemption of technology, in order to interpret the technical thought of constructing dimension beyond the criticism of technical rationality. In order to enrich the western Marxist representatives of the study of philosophy of technology. The thesis focuses on Marcuse's "Why should technology be redeemed?", "Why choose the aesthetic redemption path of technology?", "how to carry out the aesthetic redemption scheme of technology?" And "how to evaluate the aesthetic redemption thought of technology?" Four interrelated questions are unfolded, and the theoretical starting point, generating reason, logical expansion and academic evaluation of the aesthetic redemption thought of technology are answered in turn. First of all, Marcuse takes the overall criticism of the developed industrial society as the theoretical main axis, and combines the criticism of technical rationality with the criticism of ideology as the biggest characteristic. However, the mode of thinking of "technical rational determinism" finally leads to the theoretical dilemma of "vicious circle". Secondly, the paper interprets the reasons for the formation of the aesthetic redemption thought from three angles: the cultural context of aesthetic modernization, the philosophical source of "post-technical rationality" and the realistic cause of aesthetic reduction path. Thirdly, in the face of the morbid control of technological rationality in developed industrial society, Marcuse gave an aesthetic redemption scheme with technology, nature and human nature as the construction object and "aesthetic restoration" as the construction path. Finally, the paper evaluates the aesthetic redemption thought of Marcuse technology from the two dimensions of limit and value, and points out that its academic inheritance path is "critical continuation, construction turn".
【学位授予单位】：东北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：B832.1

【参考文献】