论生命体验美学及其当代建构

发布时间：2019-06-22 12:52

【摘要】：生命体验论审美观作为一种以生命为本原、以体验为核心、以自我超越为指向来把握人的审美活动的美学理念,在中西美学史上有着丰厚的历史承传,跟其他美学学派之间亦常会发生交会与互动的关系,在面临新形势需要的条件下,如何对自身固有的传统予以推陈出新,又如何有效地清理与其他学派的关系,是其实现"当代建构"所必须解决的双重任务。文章就"此在"与"不在"、"能入"与"能出"、"彼在"与"本在"、"兴"与"高峰体验"四个方面,系统比较了中西生命论美学传统的得失和异同,在此基础上提出了生命论审美观的基本结构范型与理念改进意见;还就生命论与认知论、功利论、形式主义及快乐论诸学派之间的区别和联系,逐个进行梳理辨析,阐明了它们之间可能产生的互补互动的积极作用。末了更就个人探索所得加以简要归纳,目的是要让生命体验美学成为开放的体系,跟随时代步伐不断向前发展。
[Abstract]:As an aesthetic concept based on life, taking experience as the core and taking self-transcendence as the direction, the aesthetic concept of life experience theory has rich historical inheritance in the history of Chinese and Western aesthetics, and the relationship between it and other aesthetic schools often meets and interacts with other aesthetic schools. Under the condition of facing the needs of the new situation, how to bring out its own inherent tradition. How to effectively clean up the relationship with other schools is the dual task that must be solved in order to realize the contemporary construction. This paper systematically compares the gains and differences between Chinese and Western aesthetic traditions of life theory from four aspects: "this is in" and "not in", "can enter" and "can come out", "he is in" and "Ben in", "Xing" and "Peak experience". On this basis, the basic structure model and idea improvement suggestions of life theory aesthetics are put forward. This paper also combs and analyzes the differences and relations between life theory and cognitive theory, utilitarianism, formalism and happiness theory one by one, and expounds the positive role of complementary interaction that may occur between them. Finally, the purpose of this paper is to make the aesthetics of life experience become an open system and to keep pace with the pace of the times.
【作者单位】：上海社会科学院文学研究所;
【分类号】：B83-0

【参考文献】