与崔宪先生再商榷——对《一篇缺少学术含量的“音乐评论”》一文的回应

发布时间：2018-03-31 19:23

  本文选题：“同均三宫(阶)”　切入点：“八音之乐”与“应声”　出处：《中国音乐学》2011年04期

【摘要】：本文针对崔宪先生《一篇缺少学术含量的"音乐评论"》一文指出:根据"内部听觉"或某种"理论"而将五声、六声判定为某种七声音阶是错误的;"八音之乐"是一个七声宫均与其上方五度调七声宫均的综合音列,其"第八声"因处于应钟律位故名"应声",将"应声"认作为"常规变化音"是不正确的;传统音乐中不存在"同均三宫(阶)"实例,"同均三宫(阶)"理论不能成立,"崔文"提出的所谓"三宫(阶)同均"也是无助的;新疆维吾尔族民间音乐采用"复合音乐体系",对它们音阶、调式的判定应采取"具体问题具体分析"的态度,用三种传统七声音阶硬套是不妥的。
[Abstract]:According to Mr. Cui Xian "a lack of academic content of" Music Review "> the article pointed out: according to the" internal auditory "or a" theory "and the five, six judgment for some seven tone scale is wrong;" music of music "is a seven house and five degrees above the sound adjustment comprehensive sound seven sound columns of the palace were," eighth tone "because of the law should be a bell named" crashed ", will" follow "recognized as" normal change tone "is not correct; traditional music does not exist" tongjunsangong (order) "example" tongjunsangong (order) "the theory could not be established," Cui Wen "calls" (third order) are the same "is also helpless; Xinjiang Uygur folk music by" composite music system "on their scale, mode decision should take" concrete analysis of concrete problems "attitude, with three kinds of traditional seven voice order hard set is wrong.

【分类号】：J612.1
，

本文编号：1692118