书法“工”“拙”与道德的遇见——从苏轼评述“君子”“小人”“工”“拙”与书法的关系来看
发布时间：2018-09-14 20:51
【摘要】：对于书法与道德,书法的"工"与"拙",从古至今都未曾停止过讨论。在苏轼的书法理念中,也明确提出"书有工拙,而君子小人之心不可乱也"之论。认为书有工拙之分,并以为工拙之分不是书法评介的目的,君子与小人之字不在于工拙与否,且明确提出君子与小人之字是不可等同视之的。在今天这个书法盛行的时代,也多是以"工""拙"作为书法的批评标准。但这似乎违背了古人认识书法的习惯,为此本文以苏轼为例探析古人的书法道德观及与"工""拙"的关系。
[Abstract]:For calligraphy and morality, calligraphy's "workmanship" and "clumsiness" have not stopped discussion since ancient times. In Su Shi's calligraphy idea, he also put forward the theory that "the book has works and is clumsy, but the mind of the gentleman and the villain should not be confused." The author thinks that the book has the distinction of workmanship and clumsiness, and taking it as the classification of workmanship is not the purpose of calligraphy evaluation, the character of gentleman and villain does not lie in whether the work is clumsy or not, and it is clearly pointed out that the character of gentleman and villain cannot be regarded as equivalent. In today's calligraphy era, most of the calligraphy is based on "Gong" and "clumsy" as the standard of calligraphy criticism. But this seems to violate the ancients' habit of understanding calligraphy. Therefore, this paper takes Su Shi as an example to explore the relationship between the ancient calligraphy morality and the "clumsy" of "Gong".
【作者单位】： 云南大学;
【分类号】：J292.1
，
本文编号：2243834
[Abstract]:For calligraphy and morality, calligraphy's "workmanship" and "clumsiness" have not stopped discussion since ancient times. In Su Shi's calligraphy idea, he also put forward the theory that "the book has works and is clumsy, but the mind of the gentleman and the villain should not be confused." The author thinks that the book has the distinction of workmanship and clumsiness, and taking it as the classification of workmanship is not the purpose of calligraphy evaluation, the character of gentleman and villain does not lie in whether the work is clumsy or not, and it is clearly pointed out that the character of gentleman and villain cannot be regarded as equivalent. In today's calligraphy era, most of the calligraphy is based on "Gong" and "clumsy" as the standard of calligraphy criticism. But this seems to violate the ancients' habit of understanding calligraphy. Therefore, this paper takes Su Shi as an example to explore the relationship between the ancient calligraphy morality and the "clumsy" of "Gong".
【作者单位】： 云南大学;
【分类号】：J292.1
，
本文编号：2243834
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/shufayishu/2243834.html
