激进与保守在“哲学门”相遇

发布时间：2018-01-10 19:16

本文关键词：激进与保守在“哲学门”相遇　出处：《文艺研究》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：激进与保守之"结",既是中国学术之"结",也是中国人的思想之"结"。二者如影随行,相互依存。为创造新文化打下哲学基础的王国维,在想做诗人、哲人的歧路上,遇到坚守本土文化的罗振玉,转向传统的"朴学"研究,最终以诗词了情,哲思绝命。胡适的哲学史课,把北大国学程度最深而且具有领导力量的傅斯年、顾颉刚从旧派教授的阵营中争取过来。随后,傅斯年上书蔡元培要求将哲学归入理科,并"教条"地将文学、哲学排斥在中央研究院这个最高科学研究机构之外。激进的学术领袖胡适,听王国维谈论戴震之后,开始关注清代学术,以至于最后二十年放弃哲学史、文学史写作,转向纯粹的考据学。
[Abstract]:Radical and conservative "knot" is not only the "knot" of Chinese academic, but also the "knot" of Chinese thought. They are accompanied by shadow and interdependent. Wang Guowei, who laid the philosophical foundation for the creation of new culture, wants to be a poet. On the different road of the philosophers, Luo Zhenyu, who clung to the local culture, turned to the traditional study of "Park Learning", and finally, with the poetry, the philosophy thought was doomed. Hu Shi's philosophy history lesson. Fu Sinian, who had the deepest level of national studies and the leading power in Peking University, was won by Gu Jiegang from the old school of professors. Subsequently, Fu Sinian wrote to Cai Yuanpei requesting that philosophy be classified as a science subject and "dogmatic" literature. Philosophy is excluded from Academia Sinica, the highest scientific research institution. After listening to Wang Guowei talk about Dai Zhen, a radical academic leader, Hu Shi, began to pay attention to the academic history of the Qing Dynasty, so that he gave up the history of philosophy in the last two decades. The writing of literary history turns to pure textual research.
【作者单位】：南京大学中国新文学研究中心;
【分类号】：I0-02
【正文快照】： 现代大学教育的兴起,是中国迈向现代化过程中阻力最小的一场社会变革,同时也是与民族、国家及个人关系最为密切的大事。民国时期的大学生态,首先是被西化的现代大学理念和大学精神所笼罩,其次才是本土化调适。门户开放、中西文化交流、知识的革新,使得学人由身处“天朝”、“

【相似文献】