流动的“文学性”——雅各布森“主导”诗学思想论

发布时间：2018-03-09 01:00

本文选题：罗曼·雅各布森　切入点：语言诗学　出处：《北京第二外国语学院学报》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在罗曼·雅各布森构筑的语言诗学体系中,"主导"是通往"文学性"、"诗性功能"的第一扇门。在《主导》和《语言学和诗学》两篇文章中,雅各布森不仅明确界定了"主导"概念,借此解释了诗歌作品的结构特征,还非常细致全面地解析了文学(诗歌)演变乃至艺术演变的内在规律,揭示出"文学性"的流动特性,并进一步从功能角度提出以"诗性功能占主导"来确定"文学性"的具体表现。"主导"诗学不仅实现了"形式的历史化"和"历史的形式化",更实现了结构主义语言诗学对早期俄国形式主义诗学中机械化弊病的修正以及对布拉格学派诗学理论的发展。在当代文化语境中,我们需要领会和吸收"主导"诗学的内在精神,在变动不居的本民族现实语境、历史文化和文学观念中,在"形式"与"历史"的互动之间,发挥其阐释效力和理论价值,并继续探求流动的"文学性"问题。
[Abstract]:In Romance Jacobson's system of linguistic poetics, "dominance" is the first door to "literariness," "poetic function," in two articles, "dominant" and "Linguistics and Poetics." Jacobson not only clearly defined the concept of "dominant", thus explaining the structural characteristics of poetry, but also explained the inherent law of the evolution of literature (poetry) and even the evolution of art. It reveals the flowing characteristics of "literariness", Furthermore, from the perspective of function, it is put forward that the concrete manifestation of "literariness" is determined by "poetic function dominating". "leading" poetics not only realizes "history of form" and "formalization of history", but also realizes structuralism. The modification of linguistic poetics to the malady of mechanization in early Russian formalism poetics and the development of Prague school poetics theory. We need to understand and absorb the inner spirit of "leading" poetics, exert its explanatory effect and theoretical value between "form" and "history" in the changing national realistic context, historical culture and literary concept. And continue to explore the flow of the "literariness" problem.
【作者单位】：安庆师范大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“20世纪中国美学史”(12&ZD111) 安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目“朱光潜语言诗学思想研究”(AHSKQ2014D102) 安徽省2016年高校优秀青年人才支持计划重点项目(gxyq ZD2016203)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I0

【相似文献】