《判断力批判》区分艺术天才和科学才能的内涵

发布时间：2018-03-10 07:14

本文选题：艺术天才　切入点：科学才能　出处：《东莞理工学院学报》2016年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：第三批判是康德试图沟通理论理性和实践理性的桥梁,而其中"天才问题"对艺术天才和科学才能的区分是《判断力批判》从鉴赏判断向目的论过渡的中介。这个重要的区分一方面将艺术天才的重要性从科学才能中独立出来;另一方面也为其知识论的完整性提供了连续的普遍有效性保证。这一论断既在康德的批判体系中占据"桥梁之桥梁""中介之中介"的重要位置,又首次将天才问题上升到先验的理论高度,揭示了自然通过天才的大师典范为艺术立法的创造性内涵,在打破了古典主义束缚的同时,为早期浪漫派乃至整个现代艺术理论开辟了新的路径。
[Abstract]:Third is the critique of Kant tries to communication theory and practice reason of bridge, in which the "genius" of art and science can distinguish is < > from the critique of judgment appreciation and judgment to teleology transition intermediary. This important distinction between a important art genius independent from science can out of integrity; on the other hand also provides a theory for the knowledge of the universal validity of the continuous assurance. This thesis is in Kant's system occupies "bridge bridge" and "intermediary intermediary" in an important position, and for the first time will rise to the level of theory of genius a priori, reveals the nature through the master model of genius as the law of art creative connotation, in the breaking of classical constraints at the same time, opened up a new path for early romanticism and the modern art theory.

【作者单位】：华东师范大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家留学基金管理委员会(CSC)国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(201406140012)
【分类号】：J01

【相似文献】