当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 文艺评论论文 >

话语权力与文学经典建构

发布时间:2018-03-27 14:10

  本文选题:文学经典 切入点:话语权力 出处:《东北师范大学》2009年硕士论文


【摘要】: 在文化研究语境下,文学经典问题是一个很宽泛的问题,它关系到美学、意识形态,权力、表征、社会身份、文化资本等等一系列微观或宏观的方方面面。本文试图在文化研究的视野下,探讨权力与文学经典的关系。在此基础之上,从文学史和消费文化的视角,强化对这种关系的分析。 全文共分三章: 第一章先从词源谱系入手,看经典文化权力的生成空间。以法国思想家福柯的话语权力理论为立论基础,从本质论与建构论关于经典的论争中,分析文学经典与话语权力密不可分的关系。 第二章探讨文学经典与文学史叙述之间的关系。从新历史主义文学史观入手,重点指出文学经典在文学史中的确立是权力话语运作的结果。文学史既是固化、建构经典的过程,也是不断筛选、淘汰经典的过程。 第三章描绘在消费文化的图景下,文学经典话语权嬗变的现状,指出先前那种依靠政治或学术权力来建构经典的范式被悄然打破,依靠大众媒介掌握了商业化意识形态话语权的大众读者成了建构文学经典不可或缺的力量。 总之,文学经典并不是与生俱来的,也不是恒定不变的。它的形成与命运变迁和权力的更迭与转换密不可分。权力是无处不在的。文学经典便在权力的维护、争夺与分解之中不断沉浮。
[Abstract]:In the context of cultural research, the problem of literary classics is a very broad issue, it relates to aesthetics, ideology, power, representation, social identity, This paper attempts to explore the relationship between power and literary classics from the perspective of cultural studies. On this basis, from the perspective of literary history and consumer culture, this paper tries to explore the relationship between power and literary classics. Strengthen the analysis of this relationship. The full text is divided into three chapters:. The first chapter starts with the etymological pedigree and looks at the generation space of classical cultural power. Based on the discourse power theory of French thinker Foucault, the thesis discusses the classic from the essence theory and constructivism. The relationship between literary classics and discourse power is analyzed. The second chapter discusses the relationship between literary classics and narration of literary history, starting with the new historicist view of literary history, points out that the establishment of literary classics in literary history is the result of the operation of power discourse. The process of constructing a classic is also a process of continuous screening and elimination. The third chapter depicts the current situation of the evolution of literary classics' discourse power under the picture of consumer culture, and points out that the former paradigm of relying on political or academic power to construct the classic has been quietly broken. The popular readers who depend on the mass media to grasp the right of commercial ideology have become an indispensable force in the construction of literary classics. In short, literary classics are not born, nor are they constant. Their formation is closely related to the change of destiny and the change and transformation of power. Power is everywhere. Competition and decomposition in the constant ups and downs.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2009
【分类号】:I02

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 田建民;“红色经典”的称谓能否成立[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年03期

2 夏冬红;文学经典与文学史[J];南京工业大学学报(社会科学版);2000年03期

3 李洪华;;“中国文学史”的遮蔽与“区域文学史”的空间——以“现当代文学史”为中心[J];山西师大学报(社会科学版);2006年06期

4 王确;;文学经典的历史合法性和存在方式[J];文学评论;2007年02期

5 陶东风;文学经典与文化权力(上)——文化研究视野中的文学经典问题[J];中国比较文学;2004年03期

6 吴兴明;;从消费关系座架看文学经典的商业扩张[J];中国比较文学;2006年01期



本文编号:1671846

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/1671846.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户58898***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com