新时期艺术生产理论的中国化及启示

发布时间：2018-03-30 05:40

本文选题：艺术生产理论　切入点：中国化　出处：《济南大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 马克思从政治经济学视角考察文艺问题,将艺术和生产两个概念联系起来,把艺术生产与物质生产相比较,用作文艺研究的方法论,由此提出了“艺术生产”的理论。在生产与消费的辩证关系中,马克思阐释了艺术生产的循环往复的运动过程及其规律。在马克思之后,西马文论家对艺术生产理论做了进一步的丰富和发展。伴随改革开放的春风,艺术生产理论也西学东渐传入中国。艺术生产理论在国内的发展主要经历了三个阶段。第一个阶段,20世纪70年代末到80年代初,是对艺术生产理论的引入时期。在这一时期,国内文艺理论界在对经典马克思主义文本的重读中,发现了马克思主义关于艺术生产的理论,并立即对此理论表现出了极大的兴趣。之后,不仅经典马克思主义艺术生产理论,而且西方马克思主义者关于艺术生产的理论也被源源不断的译介进来。受此刺激和引发,国内学界围绕艺术生产与物质生产的不平衡关系问题,展开了激烈的论争,一时间关于此问题的学术文章层出不穷,并且出现了一些富有见的的研究成果。第二个时期为80年代初到90年代初,是艺术生产理论在我国的理论构架时期。在这一时期,董学文等学者回到马克思经典原著中对艺术生产理论的丰富内涵进行了系统阐发,并试图以马克思主义生产论为逻辑起点建构当代形态的马克思主义文艺理论。在此期间,学界对艺术生产理论与反映论、意识形态论的关系问题,产生了广泛论争。第三个时期,即20世纪90年代至今,是艺术生产理论在我国的持续研究运用阶段。20世纪90年代初,我国的社会主义商品经济迅速发展,文艺产品的通俗性、商品化问题被提了出来。于是,当时的学者们从理论与实践的结合上,尝试着运用艺术生产理论来解答当前国内纷繁复杂的文艺现象。通过对艺术生产理论中国化的历时态梳理,我们发现,艺术生产理论在新时期的兴起及其之后在国内的发展,都不是一时的空穴来风,一方面是理论自身的发展需要,另一方面也是我国文艺实践发展的内在需要。它是与我国社会历史进程,尤其是与我国的政治、经济、文化政策和思想解放进程密切相关的。新时期关于艺术生产理论的研究,使我们进一步意识到文艺研究方法科学性的重要性。审美反映论、意识形态论、艺术生产理论不仅是马克思主义文艺学的三大理论基石,也是我们研究文艺问题的重要方法论。三者之间存在着辩证互补的关系。若忽视艺术的审美反映,只谈艺术生产论,将会使艺术生产与一般的物质生产相混同;只强调审美反映论而看不到艺术的生产效应,那么我们的艺术在市场经济的语境下可能会越来越脱离社会现实生活,最终蜕变成象牙塔里的孤芳自赏;同样,如果过分注重文艺的意识形态属性而忽视文艺的审美反映,那么文艺又会很容易陷入唯心主义的误区。鉴于此,我们认为马克思文艺学的三大基本原理是辩证互补的关系,任何顾此失彼,或扬此抑彼的做法都是不可取的。因此文章赞同综合互补的文艺学研究方法,即在三者的综合互补中研究我国当前的文艺问题,以此能够更好地解答和指导我国当前的文艺理论与文艺实践。
[Abstract]:Marx from the perspective of political economics literature, art and production of two concepts, the art production and material production compared with the method of literary study theory, thus put forward the "art production" theory. In the dialectical relationship between production and consumption, Marx explains the movement rule and process of art production back. After Marx, western literary theorists made further enriched and developed the theory of art production.
With the reform and opening-up, art production theory came into China. The development of the theory of art production in China has experienced three main stages. The first stage, late 1970s to early 80s, is on the theory of art production into the period. In this period, Chinese literary theory in the classic Marx's text reread, found Marx's theory of art production theory, and immediately showed great interest. After that, not only the classic Marx's theory of art production, and the Marx doctrine on the translation of the art production theory has been in the Everfount. This stimulus and trigger, domestic scholars and art production the imbalance between material production problems, a fierce debate on this issue, a time of scholarly articles and some rich emerge in an endless stream. In view of the outcome of the research. The second period is from early 80s to early 90s, is the theory of art production in the period of theoretical framework in China. During this period, Dong Xuewen and other scholars to enrich the connotation of Marx's theory of art production in the classic original system analysis, and try to Marx's production theory of Marx doctrine literary theory is the logical starting point of the construction of the contemporary form. During this period, scholars of art production theory and reflect on the relationship between ideology and theory, produced extensive controversy. The third periods, namely, since 1990s, is the use of the theory of art production in the continuous research in China.20 century at the beginning of 90s, the socialist commodity economy in China the rapid development of the products, the popularity of commercial problems is proposed. Then, the scholars from the combination of theory and practice, try to use art The theory of production answers the numerous and complicated literary and artistic phenomena at home.
Diachronic combing through theory of artistic production Chinese we found that the art production theory in the new period of the rise in domestic development and after all is not a hand Weakness lends wings to rumours. theory itself, is the need of development, on the other hand is the intrinsic need of Chinese literary practice development. It is associated with the process of social history in our country, especially with China's political, economic, cultural and ideological emancipation policy is closely related to the process.
Research on the theory of art production in the new period, we further realize the importance of scientific research methods of literature and arts. Aesthetic reflection theory, the theory of ideology, theory of art production is not only Marx's literary theory of the three major theoretical foundation, is an important method of our research on the issue. The relationship between the dialectical complementarity exists between the three. If you ignore the art of aesthetic reflection, only talk about the theory of art production, will make the art production mix with the general material production; only emphasize the theory of aesthetic reflection but can not see the production effect of art, then our art will be more likely to break away from the social reality of life in the market economy context, eventually transformed into indulge in self-admiration ivory the tower; similarly, if too much emphasis on the aesthetic reflection of ideology and ignore the attribute of literary art, then art will be easily mistaken idealism. Kam From this, we believe that the three basic principle of Marx's literary theory is the dialectical relationship, any complementary or blowing down upon care for this and lose that, this practice is not desirable. So in this paper we propose the comprehensive research methods complementary literature, namely in the three comprehensive complementary research in China when the problem before this, to better explain and guide China's current literature and art practice.

【学位授予单位】：济南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：J0

【参考文献】