钱谷融“文学是人学”理论沉浮及其学术意义

发布时间：2018-04-18 00:00

本文选题：钱谷融 + “文学是人学”　；参考：《河南师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：20世纪50年代,钱谷融提出“文学是人学”的人道主义文学思想,对中国现代文艺史的发展产生了深远的意义。但是由于当时特殊时代环境的影响,“文学是人学”的发展几经沉浮。本文试图通过对导致其理论沉浮变化的社会政治背景的整体考察,旨在对钱谷融“文学是人学”思想的价值及当代意义进行较为系统全面的研究。第一章主要介绍钱谷融“文学是人学”理论的提出及理论内涵。本章通过探析钱谷融“文学是人学”理论的提出始末,从关于文学的任务、关于作家的世界观与创作方法、关于评价文学作品的标准、关于各种创作方法的区别,关于人的典型性与阶级性五个方面论述钱谷融“文学是人学”的理论内涵,阐释“文学是人学”观点对我国古代传统思想及近现代学术资源中人学思想的继承与发展。第二章主要探索钱谷融“文学是人学”理论的沉寂。《论“文学是人学”》的产生及其沉浮与中国文学所处的整体社会氛围密不可分,本章通过追溯文艺界反右运动扩大化,八届十中全会对文艺的否定与控制和文化大革命等社会背景,阐发由于国内和国际政治环境的影响,学界对钱谷融“文学是人学”思想的猛烈批判,并从文学界对该命题学理逻辑、生态文艺角度的质疑及理论提出者的争论,体现了钱谷融“文学是人学”思想在当代中国文艺史上经历的坎坷历程。第三章主要探讨钱谷融“文学是人学”理论的复苏。“双百方针”的提出为《论“文学是人学”》提供了适宜的政治气候,在文艺政策的“调整”与“纠偏”和第四次全国文代会与作协第四次会议的影响下,“文学是人学”的命题重提并再度高扬,受到社会各界,特别是哲学、人文社会科学界、文艺界的普遍关注和重视,并通过巴人对“人情”的呼唤,王淑明的“人情论”以及蒋孔阳的“第三种文艺论”等同时代作家人学思想上的觉醒展现对钱谷融“文学是人学”理论的呼应与声援。第四章主要阐释钱谷融“文学是人学”理论的价值与影响。在20世纪中国现代文学史和思想史关于“人的文学”的历史脉络中,钱谷融的“文学是人学”理论具有承上启下的历史价值,启发了后世的文学创作,对后代文学的发展产生了极大的影响,同时针对文学终结论表明钱谷融的“文学是人学”命题不仅不会过时,并且在当代还将具有新的意义。
[Abstract]:In the 1950's, Qian Gurong put forward the humanitarianism literary thought of "literature is human science", which had profound significance to the development of Chinese modern literature and art history.But because of the influence of the special time environment, the development of "Literature is Man" has been ups and downs several times.This paper attempts to make a systematic and comprehensive study on the value and contemporary significance of Qian Gurong's thought of "Literature is a Man" through the overall investigation of the social and political background that led to the ups and downs of his theory.The first chapter mainly introduces Qian Gurong's theory of "Literature is Man" and its connotation.By analyzing Qian Gurong's theory of "Literature is Human", this chapter starts with the task of literature, the writer's world outlook and creative methods, the criteria of evaluating literary works, and the differences of various creative methods.This paper discusses the theoretical connotation of Qian Gurong's theory of "literature is human studies" from five aspects of human typicality and class nature, and expounds the inheritance and development of the viewpoint of "literature is human studies" to the ancient Chinese traditional thought and the modern academic resources.The second chapter mainly explores the silence of Qian Gurong's theory of "Literature is Human". [on the emergence and ups and downs of "Literature is Human" is inseparable from the overall social atmosphere of Chinese literature, this chapter is expanded by tracing back to the anti-right movement of literary and art circles.The 10th Plenary session of the eighth CPC Central Committee criticized Qian Gurong's thought of "Literature as a Man" because of the influence of domestic and international political environment on the social background, such as the negation and control of literature and art and the Cultural Revolution.And from the theoretical logic of the proposition, the ecological literature and art angle and the argument of the theoretical proponents, it reflects the rough course of Qian Gurong's thought of "Literature is Man" in the contemporary Chinese literature and art history.The third chapter mainly discusses the revival of Qian Gurong's theory of "Literature is Man".The proposal of "double hundred principles" provides a suitable political climate for "Literature is the study of Man". Under the influence of the "adjustment" and "correction" of literary and artistic policies and the fourth meeting of the National Association of Literary dynasties and Writers' Associations,The proposition of "Literature is the study of Man" is raised again and again, and it has received widespread attention and attention from all walks of life, especially philosophy, humanities and social science, literary and art circles, and through the call of the Ba people to "human feelings".The awakening of contemporary writers such as Wang Shuming's "human feeling theory" and Jiang Kongyang's "third theory of literature and art" reveals the echo and solidarity with Qian Gurong's theory of "literature is human studies".The fourth chapter mainly explains the value and influence of Qian Gurong's theory of "Literature is Man".In the history of modern Chinese literature and ideological history in the 20th century, Qian Gurong's theory of "literature is human" has the historical value of connecting with the past and the following, and has inspired the literary creation of later generations.It has a great influence on the development of future generations' literature. At the same time, the conclusion of literature shows that Qian Gurong's proposition of "literature is human studies" is not only not out of date, but also has new significance in contemporary times.
【学位授予单位】：河南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I0

【参考文献】