从“两个转向”到“两种批评”--论叙事学和文学伦理学的兴起、发展与交叉愿景

发布时间：2018-04-23 03:16

本文选题：“叙事转向” + “伦理转向”　；参考：论叙事学和文学伦理学的兴起、发展与交叉愿景

【摘要】：论及叙事学和文学伦理学的兴起与繁荣,"叙事转向"和"伦理转向"是无法绕过的话题。什么是"叙事转向"?什么是"伦理转向"?"叙事转向""伦理转向"的具体内涵及其之于叙事学和文学伦理学的发展有何作用与影响?文章在回答上述问题的基础上,考辨两大批评派别的兴起、发展与互涉,并尝试性地探讨诞生于中国语境的文学伦理学批评与叙事学之间的互补性。文章认为,考察文学作品的意义与价值,既要有内容的研究,又要兼顾形式的考察,二者不可偏废一方、顾此失彼。就此而言,以作品内容为中心分析伦理特性的文学伦理学与以作品形式为中心分析叙事特征的叙事学之间,颇有双向交流、相互借鉴的必要与可能。
[Abstract]:When it comes to the rise and prosperity of narratology and literary ethics, narrative turn and ethical turn are unavoidable topics. What is "narrative turn"? What is the "ethical turn"? " What is the specific connotation of "ethical turn" and its effect on the development of narratology and literary ethics? On the basis of answering the above questions, this paper explores the emergence, development and interrelation of the two major criticism schools, and tries to explore the complementarity between literary ethics criticism and narratology born in Chinese context. The article holds that to investigate the significance and value of literary works, we should study both the content and the form. In this regard, there is a two-way communication between literary ethics, which focuses on the content of works, and narratology, which takes the form of works as the center of analysis of narrative characteristics, and it is necessary and possible to learn from each other.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学外国语学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“麦克尤恩小说的叙事艺术与伦理思想研究”(14BWW039);国家社科基金重大项目“文学伦理学批评:理论建构与批评实践研究”(13&ZD128)
【分类号】：I0-05

【相似文献】