马克思主义文学批评中的人类学形态概观

发布时间：2018-05-21 05:57

本文选题：人类学 + 马克思主义文学批评　；参考：《外国文学研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：伊格尔顿概括了马克思主义文学批评的四种形态,并将"人类学批评"置于首位,称其为"雄心最大、影响最远"的一种。这一论断,为探讨马克思主义批评的形态类型的相关研究提供了重要参照。虽然人类学思想在马克思主义中的地位尚有争议,但当前有越来越多的学者关注二者的关系,把人类学思想看作马克思主义的重要来源。本文认为,承认二者的关联并不意味着主张马克思晚年有一个独立于唯物史观之外的"人类学阶段",也不应把马克思的人类学思考笼统地称为"人类学转向",而应当将其视为马克思主义社会研究的一部分,视为唯物史观在人类学领域的延伸和拓展;同时,我们也没有理由拒绝把马克思主义的相关研究置于人类学的视角之下进行审视。本文力图探究马克思主义理论中人类学思想的发生和嬗变过程,剖析其理论动机和功能特征,并以人类学学科的自身发展轨迹为参照,从方法、问题域和理论目的等角度呈现马克思主义人类学批评的理论概貌。
[Abstract]:Eagleton generalizes four forms of Marxist literary criticism and puts anthropological criticism in the first place, calling it the one with the greatest ambition and the furthest influence. This conclusion provides an important reference for the study of the form types of Marxist criticism. Although the status of anthropological thought in Marxism is still controversial, more and more scholars pay attention to the relationship between the two and regard anthropology thought as an important source of Marxism. This paper holds that, Recognizing the connection between the two does not mean that Marx has an anthropological stage independent of historical materialism in his later years, nor should Marx's anthropological thinking be generally referred to as "anthropological turn", but should be viewed as "anthropological turn". As part of the study of Marxist society, As an extension and expansion of historical materialism in the field of anthropology, there is no reason for us to refuse to examine the relevant research of Marxism from the perspective of anthropology. This paper tries to explore the origin and evolution of anthropological thought in Marxist theory, analyze its theoretical motivation and functional characteristics, and take the development track of anthropology as a reference. The theory of Marxist anthropological criticism is presented from the angle of problem domain and theoretical purpose.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学文学院;华中师范大学湖北文学理论与批评研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“马克思主义文学批评的中国形态研究”【项目批号:11&ZD078】的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I06

【相似文献】