忠实原则与诗歌翻译的风格变异:以《飞鸟集》三个译本为例

发布时间：2018-05-23 13:42

本文选题：《飞鸟集》 + 诗歌　；参考：《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：《飞鸟集》是一部近似英文自由诗的格言诗集。选取兰卡斯特汉语语料库及自建诗歌语料库为参照语料库,考察郑振铎、冯唐、陆晋德三个译本,聚类分析显示三个译本均出现了风格变异:"郑文"与爱情小说最为相似,而"冯文"和"陆文"与侦探小说最为相似。风格变异的原因可从高频主题词、各译本典型词汇和词汇丰富度探求:第一,"郑文"倾向选择一个固定表达对应某个英语词汇,"陆文"和"冯文"则富于变化。第二,"郑文"和"陆文"基本准确传递了原作意义,用词风格符合原文,且遵循了原文不押韵的特点。"冯文"基本表达了原作意义,但有时由于过分追求表达的简练和押韵,存在错译、漏译。第三,"冯文"的词汇丰富度高于其他两个译本,"郑文"的词汇丰富度最接近原文。研究还发现,译本越忠实于原文,其接受度也越高。
[Abstract]:Bird Collection is a collection of aphorisms similar to English free poetry. The Lancaster Chinese corpus and the self-built poetry corpus are selected as reference corpuscles to investigate the three versions of Zheng Zhenduo, Feng Tang and Lu Jinde. The cluster analysis shows that the three versions are of style variation: "Zheng Wen" is the most similar to the love novel. Feng Wen and Lu Wen are most similar to detective novels. The reasons of style variation can be explored from high frequency theme words, typical vocabulary and lexical richness of each translation. First, "Zheng Wen" tends to choose a fixed expression corresponding to a certain English vocabulary, while "Lu Wen" and "Feng Wen" are rich in variety. Second, "Zheng Wen" and "Lu Wen" basically convey the original meaning accurately, the style of the words is in line with the original text, and it follows the characteristics of the original text without rhyme. " Feng Wen basically expresses the meaning of the original work, but sometimes due to the excessive pursuit of brevity and rhyme of expression, there are mistranslations and omissions. Thirdly, the lexical richness of Feng Wen is higher than that of the other two versions, and the lexical richness of Zheng Wen is the closest to the original text. The study also found that the more faithful the translation to the original text, the higher its acceptance.
【作者单位】：浙江大学外国语言文化与国际交流学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目(11&ZD188) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目
【分类号】：H315.9;I046

【相似文献】