从《拉奥孔》看文学与造型艺术的关系

发布时间：2018-07-06 19:54

本文选题：拉奥孔 + 莱辛　；参考：《吉林大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 莱辛是启蒙运动时期伟大的美学家、思想家。他的美学论著《拉奥孔》被称为“现实主义美学里程碑”和“启蒙运动思想武器”,可见其在美学史上的地位。在书中,作者以其独特的观察视角坚定地提出了自己的见解,详细阐述了两门艺术的独特规律和明确界限,向诗画一致的学说表示了质疑与反对。这对于德国民族文学的建立,以及整个欧洲现实主义文学的发展,都提供了强大的推动力。但是,就造型艺术来说,《拉奥孔》的观点的确是十分保守的,对文学与造型艺术的区别划分过分地绝对化了,这部著作的理论缺陷是明显的表现出过多强调诗的优越性与夸大了画的局限性。本文利用大量中外艺术作品实例,从正反两方面,详细阐述了《拉奥孔》对德国乃至欧洲现实主义文学发展和对启蒙运动的促进作用,以及由于作者受时代和艺术实践的局限,在论著中所体现出的局限性,包括对造型艺术的一些不客观的评价。同时,也分析了这部美学名著对后来的艺术发展所产生的影响。
[Abstract]:Lessing was a great esthetician and thinker during the Enlightenment. His aesthetic treatise, La O'Kong, is called "the milestone of realism Aesthetics" and "the weapon of Enlightenment", which shows its position in the history of aesthetics. In the book, the author firmly puts forward his own views with his unique visual angle, expounds the unique laws and clear boundaries of the two arts in detail, and questions and opposes the theory of consistent poetry and painting. This provided a powerful impetus for the establishment of German national literature and the development of realism literature in Europe as a whole. But as far as plastic arts are concerned, La O'kon 's point of view is indeed very conservative, and the distinction between literature and plastic arts is excessively absolute. The theoretical defect of this work is that it clearly emphasizes the superiority of poetry and exaggerates the limitation of painting. Using a large number of examples of Chinese and foreign works of art, this paper expounds in detail the positive and negative effects of La O'kon on the development of realistic literature in Germany and even in Europe and on the Enlightenment, as well as the limitations of the author due to the time and artistic practice. The limitations embodied in the works include some non-objective evaluation of plastic arts. At the same time, it also analyzes the influence of this aesthetic masterpiece on the later art development.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：I0-05

【引证文献】