当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 文艺评论论文 >

浦安迪《中国叙事学》辨要

发布时间:2018-10-20 16:51
【摘要】: 美国学者浦安迪是普林斯顿大学东亚系和比较文学系教授。浦安迪的《中国叙事学》从结构、修辞等方面研究中国古典长篇章回小说,提出了以“奇书文体”为核心的叙事文学理论。对于中国的叙事文学而言,研究浦安迪的《中国叙事学》不仅具有理论价值,更有研究方法的启示。本文分为三部分,包括序论、本论和结论。 序论主要介绍《中国叙事学》的研究意义和价值、学界的研究现状以及我的研究思路。 本论从“缀段结构”与“统一结构”辨、“反讽”与曲笔辨、“通俗文学”与“文人小说”辨三个方面对《中国叙事学》进行研究辨析: 一、“缀段结构”与“统一结构”辨。浦安迪通过研究“奇书文体”的结构,认为奇书文体通过“主结构+次结构”的方式来架构全文,而不是西方某些学者认为的“有头、有身、有尾”的有机结构论,从而纠正了某些西方学者认为的中国古代叙事文学是“缀段结构”的片面之论。二、“反讽”与曲笔辨。浦安迪从反讽角度研究中国古典长篇章回小说的修辞,本文在浦安迪研究的基础上对反讽与曲笔的关系进行进一步的讨论。三、“通俗文学”与“文人小说”辨。对于中国古典长篇章回小说的性质,中国学者一般认为是“通俗文学”。与此相反,浦安迪提出了“文人小说”理论。本文从文学观念的差异与作家的才气两个角度对这一问题进行分析、辨要。 结论总结浦安迪《中国叙事学》的价值、局限及现实意义。
[Abstract]:American scholar Andy Poo is professor of East Asia and Comparative Literature at Princeton University. Pu Andy's "Chinese narratology" studies Chinese classical Zhang Hui novels from the aspects of structure and rhetoric, and puts forward the narrative literature theory centered on "the style of rare Books". For Chinese narrative literature, the study of Andy Pu's Chinese narratology has not only theoretical value, but also the enlightenment of research methods. This article is divided into three parts, including preface theory, this theory and conclusion. The preface mainly introduces the significance and value of Chinese narratology, the current situation of academic research and my research ideas. This paper distinguishes Chinese narratology from three aspects: "the structure of affix paragraph" and "unified structure", "irony" and "qu pen", "popular literature" and "literati novel". The distinction between "suffix structure" and "unified structure". By studying the structure of the novel, Andy Pu thinks that the style of the novel constructs the full text by the way of "the main structure and the substructure", rather than the organic structure theory of "having the head, having the body, having the end", as some western scholars think. Thus, some western scholars correct the one-sided view that ancient Chinese narrative literature is "affixed paragraph structure". Second, irony and the argument of qu pen. From the perspective of irony, Pu Andy studies the rhetoric of Chinese classical novels. This paper further discusses the relationship between irony and qu pen on the basis of his research. Third, the distinction between popular Literature and Literati Fiction. As to the nature of Chinese classical novels, Chinese scholars generally regard them as "popular literature". On the contrary, Andy Poe put forward the theory of "literati novel". This paper analyzes this problem from the point of view of literary concept difference and writer's talent. Conclusion the value, limitation and practical significance of Pu Andy's Chinese narratology are summarized.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2009
【分类号】:I02

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 秦剑蓝;;叙事:形式、历史与民族——读《中国古代叙事思想研究》[J];湖南科技学院学报;2011年06期

2 高蕾;;温庭筠《乾(月],

本文编号:2283776


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2283776.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4dd54***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com