从文学性角度谈《红字》中译
发布时间：2018-11-18 07:10
【摘要】：从文学性角度看待文学翻译,是一个创新的话题。文学性这一概念由20世纪俄国形式主义批评家雅各布森提出,他认为“文学研究的对象并非文学而是‘文学性’,即那种使特定作品成为文学作品的东西。”文学性在文学翻译中,往往表现在语言、修辞、文体风格等方面。基于文学性,本文对《红字》中译进行研究。霍桑的《红字》是美国文学史上一部巨著,它的文学性体现在诸多方面,其中比较突出的有人物形象、象征主义手法、诗性语言和多重主题。文中主要人物姓名各有不同的象征意义,字母A贯穿整个故事,对不同的人物在不同的时间有不同的象征意义,而不同场景的运用也常富含象征。此外,《红字》的诗性语言也是其文学性的重要体现,反讽手法则多运用于当权者和群众形象塑造。《红字》的主题允许多种阐释,我们可以从爱情、罪恶、救赎、人性、宗教、女权等多方面看待它。本文通过分析侍桁和姚乃强两位译者《红字》译本文学性再现,论证文学性在文学翻译中的保留、丢失和补偿。在翻译《红字》的过程中,侍桁和姚乃强两位译者都努力再现原文文学性,但不可否认,在这过程中,原文部分文学性在译文中丢失了,如在再现人物时,侍桁译本中海丝特的果断、丁梅斯代尔的虚伪和齐灵窝斯的可悲被弱化。译本中文学性的再现及丢失,也导致了中西文学史上对人物形象的评价有所不同。而人物形象的弱化,也导致了对主题的不同阐释。西方文学史上常常将《红字》与个人主义联系,而中国文学史则少见。这与意识形态有一定的关系,但翻译在这其中同样起了重要作用。再者,中国文学史上对《红字》的象征手法多是轻描淡写,这是由于在翻译过程中,人物姓名以及字母A的象征意义或多或少都有所损失,从而影响了读者对《红字》这方面文学性的接受。而由于国内学者均更多地将注意力投放在《红字》的人物、主题和象征手法,诗性语言在文学史中少有提及。
[Abstract]:It is an innovative topic to treat literary translation from the literary point of view. The concept of literariness was put forward by Jacobson, a Russian formalist critic in the 20th century, who considered that "the object of literary study is not literature but literariness, that is, something that makes a particular work a literary work." Literariness is often manifested in language, rhetoric and stylistic style in literary translation. Based on literariness, this paper studies the Chinese translation of the Scarlet letter. Hawthorne's Scarlet letter is a masterpiece in the history of American literature. Its literariness is embodied in many aspects, among which prominent figures are figures, symbolism, poetic language and many themes. The main characters in the text have different symbolic meanings. The letter A runs through the whole story. It has different symbolic meanings for different characters at different times, and the use of different scenes is often rich in symbols. In addition, the poetic language of the Scarlet letter is also an important embodiment of its literariness. Irony is often used in shaping the image of those in power and the masses. The theme of the Scarlet letter allows for a variety of interpretations. We can interpret it from love, sin, redemption, and human nature. Religion, women's rights and so on look at it in many ways. By analyzing the literariness reappearance in the translation of the Scarlet letter by Shi Chuan and Yao Naiqiang, this paper demonstrates the retention, loss and compensation of literariness in literary translation. In the process of translating the Scarlet letter, both Shih and Yao strive to reproduce the literariness of the original text, but there is no denying that in this process, part of the literariness of the original text has been lost in the translation, such as when reproducing the characters. The decisiveness of Hester, the hypocrisy of Dimmesdale and the sadness of Chillingworth are weakened. The reappearance and loss of literariness in the translation also lead to different evaluation of characters in the history of Chinese and Western literature. The weakening of characters also leads to different interpretations of themes. The Scarlet letter is often associated with individualism in the history of western literature, while the history of Chinese literature is rare. This has a certain relationship with ideology, but translation also plays an important role in it. Moreover, in the history of Chinese literature, the symbolism of the Scarlet letter is mostly understated, because in the process of translation, the symbolic meaning of the character's name and letter A is more or less lost. Therefore, it affects readers' acceptance of this aspect of the Scarlet letter. Due to the fact that scholars in China have paid more attention to the characters, themes and symbolism of the Scarlet letter, poetical language is seldom mentioned in the history of literature.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H315.9;I046
本文编号：2339263
[Abstract]:It is an innovative topic to treat literary translation from the literary point of view. The concept of literariness was put forward by Jacobson, a Russian formalist critic in the 20th century, who considered that "the object of literary study is not literature but literariness, that is, something that makes a particular work a literary work." Literariness is often manifested in language, rhetoric and stylistic style in literary translation. Based on literariness, this paper studies the Chinese translation of the Scarlet letter. Hawthorne's Scarlet letter is a masterpiece in the history of American literature. Its literariness is embodied in many aspects, among which prominent figures are figures, symbolism, poetic language and many themes. The main characters in the text have different symbolic meanings. The letter A runs through the whole story. It has different symbolic meanings for different characters at different times, and the use of different scenes is often rich in symbols. In addition, the poetic language of the Scarlet letter is also an important embodiment of its literariness. Irony is often used in shaping the image of those in power and the masses. The theme of the Scarlet letter allows for a variety of interpretations. We can interpret it from love, sin, redemption, and human nature. Religion, women's rights and so on look at it in many ways. By analyzing the literariness reappearance in the translation of the Scarlet letter by Shi Chuan and Yao Naiqiang, this paper demonstrates the retention, loss and compensation of literariness in literary translation. In the process of translating the Scarlet letter, both Shih and Yao strive to reproduce the literariness of the original text, but there is no denying that in this process, part of the literariness of the original text has been lost in the translation, such as when reproducing the characters. The decisiveness of Hester, the hypocrisy of Dimmesdale and the sadness of Chillingworth are weakened. The reappearance and loss of literariness in the translation also lead to different evaluation of characters in the history of Chinese and Western literature. The weakening of characters also leads to different interpretations of themes. The Scarlet letter is often associated with individualism in the history of western literature, while the history of Chinese literature is rare. This has a certain relationship with ideology, but translation also plays an important role in it. Moreover, in the history of Chinese literature, the symbolism of the Scarlet letter is mostly understated, because in the process of translation, the symbolic meaning of the character's name and letter A is more or less lost. Therefore, it affects readers' acceptance of this aspect of the Scarlet letter. Due to the fact that scholars in China have paid more attention to the characters, themes and symbolism of the Scarlet letter, poetical language is seldom mentioned in the history of literature.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H315.9;I046
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 马汉广;;“文学性”概念的多重蕴涵与当下意义[J];文艺研究;2014年07期
2 谢怀志;;《红字》的艺术特征与情感内涵[J];长城;2012年08期
3 杨矗;;文学性新释[J];上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年02期
4 周维东;;新世纪文学研究:如何面对“文学性”?[J];文艺评论;2007年02期
5 余虹;文学的终结与文学性蔓延——兼谈后现代文学研究的任务[J];文艺研究;2002年06期
6 段双全;浅论“诗性语言”的特点[J];语文教学与研究;2002年13期
7 史忠义;“文学性”的定义之我见[J];中国比较文学;2000年03期
8 戴震;论霍桑的《红字》[J];四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1983年02期
9 熊玉鹏;《红字》浅论[J];外国文学研究;1980年01期
，本文编号：2339263
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2339263.html
