论朗吉努斯“崇高”视域下的艺术“想象”
发布时间：2018-12-12 05:08
【摘要】：朗吉努斯吸收古希腊哲学领域认识论范畴的想象概念,结合雄辩术修辞学发展的时代契机,在《论崇高》中从文学修辞手段的角度重新考察和界定了艺术想象。他将想象认定为诗人和演说家使用语言呈现意象的能力,并将之视为构建文学艺术崇高风格的重要途径;在"崇高"视域下,想象与创作主体崇尚伟大理念、仰视真理的思想以及真挚强烈的感情密不可分;想象的介入使文学艺术呈现一种"诗性之真实"的同时也拓宽了其审美维度,从而激发读者和听众的情感。这一古典思想将艺术创作变成一种基于读者反应的表达过程,为以后的文艺理论深入探讨想象概念奠定了基础。
[Abstract]:Langinus absorbed the imagination concept of epistemological category in the field of ancient Greek philosophy, combined with the opportunity of the development of rhetoric of eloquence, and reexamined and defined artistic imagination from the angle of literary rhetoric in on loftiness. He regards imagination as the ability of poets and orators to present images in language, and regards it as an important way to construct the noble style of literature and art. From the perspective of "sublime", imagination and creative subject advocate the great idea, look up to the thought of truth and sincere and strong feelings. The involvement of imagination makes literature and art present a "poetic truth" and broaden its aesthetic dimension, thus arousing the emotion of readers and listeners. This classical thought turned artistic creation into a process of expression based on readers' response, which laid a foundation for the further exploration of the concept of imagination in literary theory.
【作者单位】： 上海交通大学外国语学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(13BWW054)
【分类号】：I0
本文编号：2373971
[Abstract]:Langinus absorbed the imagination concept of epistemological category in the field of ancient Greek philosophy, combined with the opportunity of the development of rhetoric of eloquence, and reexamined and defined artistic imagination from the angle of literary rhetoric in on loftiness. He regards imagination as the ability of poets and orators to present images in language, and regards it as an important way to construct the noble style of literature and art. From the perspective of "sublime", imagination and creative subject advocate the great idea, look up to the thought of truth and sincere and strong feelings. The involvement of imagination makes literature and art present a "poetic truth" and broaden its aesthetic dimension, thus arousing the emotion of readers and listeners. This classical thought turned artistic creation into a process of expression based on readers' response, which laid a foundation for the further exploration of the concept of imagination in literary theory.
【作者单位】： 上海交通大学外国语学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(13BWW054)
【分类号】：I0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 何伟文;;论朗吉努斯《论崇高》中关于艺术家的思想[J];上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年04期
2 许家进;;重新挖掘朗吉努斯崇高理论对当今文学活动的积极意义[J];时代文学(下半月);2012年03期
3 许家进;;从文学文体学角度谈后现代理论对朗吉努斯崇高理论的解构[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2006年04期
4 王在衡;;《论崇高》初探[J];昆明师专学报;1989年04期
5 田英华;;朗吉努斯、博克、康德论崇高[J];兰州学刊;2007年06期
6 张萍,刘世生;试论朗吉努斯的美学理论对现代文学文体学的影响[J];清华大学教育研究;2003年S1期
7 许家进;;中国唐代古文家与古希腊朗吉努斯的文道观比较[J];山花;2011年18期
8 方锡球;历代“崇高”论的艺术形态学意义[J];安庆师院社会科学学报;1996年01期
9 张世英;从朗吉努斯的《论崇高》看屈原的《离骚》[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年03期
10 吕满金;;浅谈《论崇高》产生的文化背景[J];文学界(理论版);2010年10期
，本文编号：2373971
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2373971.html
