论重复的诗学功能
发布时间：2019-01-22 14:28
【摘要】： 在某种意义上,文学是复合重复的编织物,是重复套重复的构成体。因此,正如J.希利斯·米勒所言,对文本的解读,在一定程度上得通过对重复现象的识别,进而理解由之衍生的意义。这也成为了一种流行性的研究方法之一,诸如原型理论、新批评、结构主义等等。其外,还有大量有关具体文本重复现象的理解与阐释。但是,必须明了的是,这并不就意味着有关重复的研究已根深叶茂。恰恰相反的是,人们往往将重复当作一个可以洞烛微明的有效工具,而对于这工具本身的研究,却缺乏深入;另一方面,也往往专注于具体文本的具体重复现象,而缺乏对重复自身的普遍性理论的探讨与建构。因此,连重复这一术语的界定,直至今日,尚缺深入的探讨和权威的定论。 本文要做的是,首先是对文学意义上的重复概念进行辨析、梳整,理顺其内涵外延,确立行之有效的界定框架,对其诗学意义进行适度的评述与挖掘。进而以之为据,对重复理论既有研究中的最为薄弱的环节,即诗性功能进行探讨。 鉴于重复衍生意义的复杂性,本文不探讨其意义所指,而意在关注其衍生意义的方式,即探讨重复的基本诗性功能。在探讨这一基本功能时,借鉴了普罗普《故事形态学》和施塔格尔《诗学的基本概念》中的形态学方法。从重复和被重复之间的张力关系入手,推定出三种基本的功能形态:再现式、反讽式、互文式。这三种功能不是彼此对立,而是彼此交织缠结。任何一种重复衍生的诗学意义,都是这三种功能合力的产物。这三种功能在具体的重复中显现出来的力度并非均衡,因此,也就带来了重复意义的复杂多变。
[Abstract]:In a sense, literature is a complex repetition of the fabric, is a repeat of the composition of the set. So, just as J. Hillis Hans Muller said that the interpretation of the text, to some extent, through the recognition of repetition, and then understand the meaning derived from it. This has also become one of the popular research methods, such as prototype theory, new criticism, structuralism and so on. In addition, there are a large number of specific text repetition phenomenon understanding and interpretation. It must be clear, however, that this does not mean that the study of repetition is deeply rooted. On the contrary, people tend to regard repetition as an effective tool which can be illuminated by holes, but the study of the tool itself is lacking in depth; On the other hand, it often focuses on the specific repetition of specific texts, and lacks the discussion and construction of the universal theory of repetition itself. Therefore, even repeated the definition of this term, until today, there is no in-depth discussion and authoritative conclusion. What this article should do is, first of all, to discriminate and analyze the concept of repetition in the sense of literature, combing it, straightening out its connotation and extension, establishing an effective definition frame, and making a moderate comment and excavation on its poetic significance. On the basis of this, this paper discusses the most weak link in the existing research of repetition theory, namely poetic function. In view of the complexity of the meaning derived from repetition, this paper does not discuss the meaning of the meaning, but intends to pay attention to the way of its derived meaning, that is, to explore the basic poetic function of repetition. In discussing this basic function, we draw lessons from the morphological methods in Prop's Tales Morphology and Stagger's the basic concept of Poetics. Starting from the tension relationship between repetition and being repeated, three basic functional forms are deduced: reproducing, irony and intertextuality. These three functions are not opposed to each other, but intertwined with each other. Any repeated derivative of poetic significance is the product of these three functional forces. These three functions are not balanced in the specific repetition, therefore, they bring the complex and changeable meaning of repetition.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：I052
本文编号：2413303
[Abstract]:In a sense, literature is a complex repetition of the fabric, is a repeat of the composition of the set. So, just as J. Hillis Hans Muller said that the interpretation of the text, to some extent, through the recognition of repetition, and then understand the meaning derived from it. This has also become one of the popular research methods, such as prototype theory, new criticism, structuralism and so on. In addition, there are a large number of specific text repetition phenomenon understanding and interpretation. It must be clear, however, that this does not mean that the study of repetition is deeply rooted. On the contrary, people tend to regard repetition as an effective tool which can be illuminated by holes, but the study of the tool itself is lacking in depth; On the other hand, it often focuses on the specific repetition of specific texts, and lacks the discussion and construction of the universal theory of repetition itself. Therefore, even repeated the definition of this term, until today, there is no in-depth discussion and authoritative conclusion. What this article should do is, first of all, to discriminate and analyze the concept of repetition in the sense of literature, combing it, straightening out its connotation and extension, establishing an effective definition frame, and making a moderate comment and excavation on its poetic significance. On the basis of this, this paper discusses the most weak link in the existing research of repetition theory, namely poetic function. In view of the complexity of the meaning derived from repetition, this paper does not discuss the meaning of the meaning, but intends to pay attention to the way of its derived meaning, that is, to explore the basic poetic function of repetition. In discussing this basic function, we draw lessons from the morphological methods in Prop's Tales Morphology and Stagger's the basic concept of Poetics. Starting from the tension relationship between repetition and being repeated, three basic functional forms are deduced: reproducing, irony and intertextuality. These three functions are not opposed to each other, but intertwined with each other. Any repeated derivative of poetic significance is the product of these three functional forces. These three functions are not balanced in the specific repetition, therefore, they bring the complex and changeable meaning of repetition.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：I052
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 高蒙;米兰·昆德拉小说中的重复现象研究[D];湘潭大学;2011年
，本文编号：2413303
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2413303.html
