意图岂能成为谬误——张江与本尼特、罗伊尔、莫德、博斯托克英国对话录
发布时间：2019-03-01 12:25
【摘要】：文学作品是有意义的,它就是作者运用文学语言和艺术形式力图表达的世界观、人生观、价值观,亦即作者对自然、社会、历史和人的看法。这是从古代到近代文学研究和文学批评领域的主流观点。然而,进入20世纪,特别是自20世纪40年代起,这一观点受到许多文学理论研究者的质疑和挑战。在西方各种哲学流派以及语言学、心理学、社会学乃至自然科学领域各种思潮的影响之下,一些文学理论研究者和文学批评者尝试借用或援引文学之外的理论和方法,对文学作品的意义作出与传统不同的阐释。罗兰·巴特《作者之死》(The Death Of The Author)问世后,在中西学界引起广泛关注。后结构主义观点认为,语言无法可靠地反映现实,文学无法清晰地反映生活;既然无法对文学作品进行最终的确切性的解读,那么任何理解都可能是误读。在日趋激烈的争鸣与论辩中,人们始终抱持这样一个疑问:作者是否还是文本意义的可靠来源?多年来,中国社会科学院副院长张江教授密切关注当代西方文论的发展与流变,他针对当代西方文论存在问题提出的"强制阐释论"、"理论中心论"等,引起国内外学界广泛关注和热烈讨论。2016年12月初,张江教授率团对英国进行学术访问期间,在苏塞克斯大学与英国专家学者进行了座谈,围绕文学作品的意义和作者的意图等文学批评理论的原点问题,结合具体文学作品及文学创作实践展开讨论。现将张江教授与英国专家学者对话的主要内容摘录发表,以为学界同仁借鉴和参考。
[Abstract]:Literary works are meaningful. They are the world outlook, outlook on life and values which the author tries to express by using literary language and artistic forms, that is, the author's views on nature, society, history and human beings. This is the mainstream point of view in the field of literary research and literary criticism from ancient to modern times. However, in the 20th century, especially since the 1940s, this view has been questioned and challenged by many researchers of literary theory. Under the influence of various philosophical schools in the West, as well as various ideological trends in linguistics, psychology, sociology and even natural sciences, some literary theory researchers and literary critics have tried to borrow or cite theories and methods other than literature. Make a different interpretation of the meaning of literary works from the traditional. (The Death Of The Author), the author's death by Roland Bart, has attracted extensive attention in Chinese and Western circles. From the viewpoint of post-structuralism, language can not reliably reflect reality and literature can not clearly reflect life; since it is impossible to interpret literary works with final accuracy, then any understanding may be misreading. In the increasingly fierce debate and debate, people always hold the question: is the author still a reliable source of the meaning of the text? Over the years, Professor Zhang Jiang, Vice President of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, has paid close attention to the development and evolution of contemporary western literary theory. He has put forward "compulsory hermeneutics" and "theoretical centralism" in response to the problems existing in contemporary western literary theory, and so on. In early December 2016, Professor Zhang Jiang led a delegation to the United Kingdom during an academic visit to the United Kingdom, during which he held a discussion with British experts and scholars at Sussex University. Focusing on the origin of literary criticism theory such as the meaning of literary works and the author's intention, this paper discusses the specific literary works and the practice of literary creation. The main contents of the dialogue between Professor Zhang Jiang and British experts and scholars are excerpted and published for the reference of academic colleagues.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院;英国布里斯托尔大学;英国苏塞克斯大学;
【分类号】：I0
本文编号：2432426
[Abstract]:Literary works are meaningful. They are the world outlook, outlook on life and values which the author tries to express by using literary language and artistic forms, that is, the author's views on nature, society, history and human beings. This is the mainstream point of view in the field of literary research and literary criticism from ancient to modern times. However, in the 20th century, especially since the 1940s, this view has been questioned and challenged by many researchers of literary theory. Under the influence of various philosophical schools in the West, as well as various ideological trends in linguistics, psychology, sociology and even natural sciences, some literary theory researchers and literary critics have tried to borrow or cite theories and methods other than literature. Make a different interpretation of the meaning of literary works from the traditional. (The Death Of The Author), the author's death by Roland Bart, has attracted extensive attention in Chinese and Western circles. From the viewpoint of post-structuralism, language can not reliably reflect reality and literature can not clearly reflect life; since it is impossible to interpret literary works with final accuracy, then any understanding may be misreading. In the increasingly fierce debate and debate, people always hold the question: is the author still a reliable source of the meaning of the text? Over the years, Professor Zhang Jiang, Vice President of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, has paid close attention to the development and evolution of contemporary western literary theory. He has put forward "compulsory hermeneutics" and "theoretical centralism" in response to the problems existing in contemporary western literary theory, and so on. In early December 2016, Professor Zhang Jiang led a delegation to the United Kingdom during an academic visit to the United Kingdom, during which he held a discussion with British experts and scholars at Sussex University. Focusing on the origin of literary criticism theory such as the meaning of literary works and the author's intention, this paper discusses the specific literary works and the practice of literary creation. The main contents of the dialogue between Professor Zhang Jiang and British experts and scholars are excerpted and published for the reference of academic colleagues.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院;英国布里斯托尔大学;英国苏塞克斯大学;
【分类号】：I0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 雯清;;2008大型公共艺术活动展现场张江[J];浦东开发;2008年10期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 本报记者 杨琳;“公共艺术在张江”要创造诗意园区[N];上海证券报;2007年
2 杨吟;张江进行式[N];经济观察报;2006年
，本文编号：2432426
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2432426.html
