有关当代人文科学研究主体心态素质提升问题的思考——以赵宪章、邓晓芒和鲍鹏山教授及其相关论著为分析例据
发布时间:2019-03-17 09:50
【摘要】:本文划分当下中国人文科学研究为项目学术、学院学术和江湖学术三种类型,并分别选取赵宪章教授等合著《艺术与语言的关系研究》、邓晓芒教授《文学冲突的四大主题》和鲍鹏山教授《孔子如来》作为代表。文章侧重从研究者主体心态素质提升的角度讨论中国学术研究生态环境改善的可能性,以此回应有关"当下中国如何造就学术大师"问题的讨论。对应研究工作的三种类型,就研究者的意识自觉言之,应注意克服三种可能的消极心态对研究过程所可能造成的干扰,即执掌话语权意识所可能滋生的虚妄、学术成就所可能导致的自恋和江湖声誉所可能诱发的任性。所谓心态素质的核心,即反省并自觉克服诸如此类消极心态对研究过程的干扰的能力。
[Abstract]:This paper divides the current Chinese humanities research into three types: project academic, college academic and Jianghu academic, and selects Professor Zhao and other co-authors of the study of the relationship between Art and language, respectively. Professor Deng Xiaomang and Professor Bao Pengshan represented the four themes of literary conflict. This paper focuses on discussing the possibility of improving the ecological environment of Chinese academic research from the perspective of the improvement of the subjective mental quality of the researchers, so as to respond to the discussion about "how to build up academic masters in China at present". Corresponding to the three types of research work, in terms of the consciousness of the researcher, we should pay attention to overcoming the interference that the three possible negative mentality may cause to the research process, that is, the hypocrisy that the consciousness of holding on to the discourse right may breed. Academic achievements may lead to narcissism and self-determination that may be induced by reputation. The core of the so-called psychological quality is the ability to reflect and consciously overcome the interference of such negative psychology on the research process.
【作者单位】: 北京语言大学;
【分类号】:I0
本文编号:2442173
[Abstract]:This paper divides the current Chinese humanities research into three types: project academic, college academic and Jianghu academic, and selects Professor Zhao and other co-authors of the study of the relationship between Art and language, respectively. Professor Deng Xiaomang and Professor Bao Pengshan represented the four themes of literary conflict. This paper focuses on discussing the possibility of improving the ecological environment of Chinese academic research from the perspective of the improvement of the subjective mental quality of the researchers, so as to respond to the discussion about "how to build up academic masters in China at present". Corresponding to the three types of research work, in terms of the consciousness of the researcher, we should pay attention to overcoming the interference that the three possible negative mentality may cause to the research process, that is, the hypocrisy that the consciousness of holding on to the discourse right may breed. Academic achievements may lead to narcissism and self-determination that may be induced by reputation. The core of the so-called psychological quality is the ability to reflect and consciously overcome the interference of such negative psychology on the research process.
【作者单位】: 北京语言大学;
【分类号】:I0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 邓晓芒;;文学冲突的四大主题[J];中国文学批评;2015年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 韩德民;;有关当代人文科学研究主体心态素质提升问题的思考——以赵宪章、邓晓芒和鲍鹏山教授及其相关论著为分析例据[J];中国文化研究;2017年03期
2 赵娜;;还原与复活:抗战小说真实形态的超越——论熊育群《己卯年雨雪》的文学史意义[J];文艺争鸣;2017年07期
3 邓晓芒;;论文学批评的力量[J];湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2016年06期
4 邓晓芒;;作为“大科学”的人文科学——一种“正位论”的思考[J];哲学分析;2016年02期
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 朱德发;读《文学的调整与再生》[J];聊城师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年06期
,本文编号:2442173
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2442173.html