从现代哲学阐释学视角解读林译《块肉余生述》
发布时间：2019-04-13 09:47
【摘要】：通过与口译者合作，林纾耳受笔追，于1899年出版其第一本译作《巴黎茶花女遗事》，，此后国人心目中域外小说的形象完全改变，翻译小说大盛（陈平原，1989：28）。沿用这种独特的翻译方式，林纾共翻译外国文学作品180余部，其中《块肉余生述》便是他自认为翻译得最认真也是翻译得最好的作品之一。林纾也因此在中国翻译史上取得了举足轻重的地位，与严复一起享有“译才并世数严林”之美誉(王宏志,2007：199)。然而，在以原文为参照标准的翻译时代，林纾的作品也饱受争议，他的译文被指责为不忠实于原作，误译、漏译随处可见。为何这样备受责难的翻译在当时还受到读者竞相追捧？ 本文引入了安德烈·勒费弗尔的改写概念，即改写是泛指对文学原作进行的翻译、改写、编撰选集、批评和编辑等各种加工和调整的过程；林译《块肉余生述》因此可以被看成是一部对原作的改写。论文同时借助现代哲学阐释学的相关理论来解读林译《块肉余生述》中的一些重要改写现象。阐释学是一门关于意义的理解和解释的理论和哲学，起源于古希腊罗马时代，传统阐释学最早被用于对圣经的解释，后来伽达默尔等人将其发展为系统的现代哲学阐释学，其中“偏见”、“理解的历史性”、“视域融合”和“效果历史”等概念为翻译研究提供了新的视角，具有重要的指导意义。尤其是“视域融合”，它使译者的主观能动性和创造性得到了前所未有的重视。从伽达默尔的哲学阐释学角度来看，翻译的过程即是译者和原文作者、译者和译文读者之间的对话过程。现代哲学阐释学理论对翻译研究的作用就在于它赋予译者一定程度的自由和创造性，使其能跳出原文本狭隘的视域。利用现代哲学阐释学分析翻译中的改写现象，一方面可以摆脱原文中心论，证实改写存在的合理性；另一方面又可以避免过分强调译者主体性。通过案例分析，我们能够更加清晰地认识到现代哲学阐释学在翻译研究中的方法论作用。 论文主要从两个方面解读林译《块肉余生述》中的改写现象：一方面运用现代哲学阐释学中的“偏见”理论，按照意识形态上的文化因素对林纾的“偏见”进行归类，分析解读译作中的一些重要改写例子；另一方面，作者从现代哲学阐释学的对话角度揭示改写过程中存在的译者和原文作者以及译者和译文读者的对话；最后总结出林纾的《块肉余生述》是一部合理的、成功的改写，其改写是译者和原文作者、译者和译文读者达到最大程度视域融合的结果，是效果历史的具体体现。
[Abstract]:Through cooperation with the interpreter, Lin was chased down by pen and published his first translated book, Paris Camellia Legend, in 1899. Since then, the image of the extraterritorial novels in the minds of the Chinese people has completely changed, and the translated novels have flourished (Chen Ping-ping, 1989-28). Following this unique way of translation, Lin Shu has translated more than 180 foreign literary works, among which, "the Meat of Life" is one of the most serious and well translated works he considers to be the most serious and well translated. As a result, Lin Shu has gained an important position in the history of translation in China and enjoys the reputation of "talent in translation and Yan Lin in the world" with Yan Fu (Wang Hongzhi, 2007 / 199). However, in the age of translation based on the original text, Lin Shu's works have also been controversial, and his translations have been accused of being unfaithful to the original, mistranslating and missing translations everywhere. Why was such a reproachful translation sought after by readers at that time? This paper introduces Andre Lefevere's rewriting concept, that is, rewriting refers to the process of translation, rewriting, compilation of anthology, criticism and editing of the original literary works. Therefore, Lin can be regarded as a rewriting of the original book. At the same time, the thesis interprets some important rewriting phenomena in Lin's translation of the Meat remainder by means of the relevant theories of modern philosophical hermeneutics. Hermeneutics is a theory and philosophy of meaning understanding and interpretation, which originated in ancient Greek and Roman times. Traditional hermeneutics was first used to explain the Bible, and later Gadamer and others developed it into systematic modern philosophical hermeneutics. Among them, the concepts of "prejudice", "historical understanding", "horizon fusion" and "effect history" provide a new perspective for translation studies and have important guiding significance. In particular, "horizon fusion" makes the translator's subjective initiative and creativity get unprecedented attention. From the perspective of Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics, the process of translation is the process of dialogue between the translator and the original author, the translator and the target reader. The role of modern philosophical hermeneutics in translation studies is that it gives the translator a certain degree of freedom and creativity, so that he can go beyond the narrow perspective of the original text. The analysis of rewriting in translation by means of modern philosophical hermeneutics can, on the one hand, get rid of the original-centered theory and prove the rationality of rewriting; on the other hand, it can avoid overemphasizing the translator's subjectivity. Through case studies, we can more clearly understand the methodological role of modern philosophical hermeneutics in translation studies. The thesis mainly interprets the rewriting phenomenon of Lin Shu's "prejudice" in the translation from two aspects: on the one hand, it classifies Lin Shu's "prejudice" according to the ideological cultural factors by using the "prejudice" theory in modern philosophical hermeneutics, which is based on the theory of "prejudice" in modern philosophical hermeneutics. To analyze and interpret some important examples of rewriting in translation; On the other hand, from the perspective of dialogue in modern philosophical hermeneutics, the author reveals the dialogue between the translator and the original author, as well as the translator and the target reader in the rewriting process. In the end, it is concluded that Lin Shu's Meat Reproach is a reasonable and successful rewriting. The rewriting is the result of the fusion of the translator and the original author, the translator and the reader of the target text to the maximum extent, and it is the concrete embodiment of the effect history.
【学位授予单位】：福州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：H315.9;I046
本文编号：2457453
[Abstract]:Through cooperation with the interpreter, Lin was chased down by pen and published his first translated book, Paris Camellia Legend, in 1899. Since then, the image of the extraterritorial novels in the minds of the Chinese people has completely changed, and the translated novels have flourished (Chen Ping-ping, 1989-28). Following this unique way of translation, Lin Shu has translated more than 180 foreign literary works, among which, "the Meat of Life" is one of the most serious and well translated works he considers to be the most serious and well translated. As a result, Lin Shu has gained an important position in the history of translation in China and enjoys the reputation of "talent in translation and Yan Lin in the world" with Yan Fu (Wang Hongzhi, 2007 / 199). However, in the age of translation based on the original text, Lin Shu's works have also been controversial, and his translations have been accused of being unfaithful to the original, mistranslating and missing translations everywhere. Why was such a reproachful translation sought after by readers at that time? This paper introduces Andre Lefevere's rewriting concept, that is, rewriting refers to the process of translation, rewriting, compilation of anthology, criticism and editing of the original literary works. Therefore, Lin can be regarded as a rewriting of the original book. At the same time, the thesis interprets some important rewriting phenomena in Lin's translation of the Meat remainder by means of the relevant theories of modern philosophical hermeneutics. Hermeneutics is a theory and philosophy of meaning understanding and interpretation, which originated in ancient Greek and Roman times. Traditional hermeneutics was first used to explain the Bible, and later Gadamer and others developed it into systematic modern philosophical hermeneutics. Among them, the concepts of "prejudice", "historical understanding", "horizon fusion" and "effect history" provide a new perspective for translation studies and have important guiding significance. In particular, "horizon fusion" makes the translator's subjective initiative and creativity get unprecedented attention. From the perspective of Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics, the process of translation is the process of dialogue between the translator and the original author, the translator and the target reader. The role of modern philosophical hermeneutics in translation studies is that it gives the translator a certain degree of freedom and creativity, so that he can go beyond the narrow perspective of the original text. The analysis of rewriting in translation by means of modern philosophical hermeneutics can, on the one hand, get rid of the original-centered theory and prove the rationality of rewriting; on the other hand, it can avoid overemphasizing the translator's subjectivity. Through case studies, we can more clearly understand the methodological role of modern philosophical hermeneutics in translation studies. The thesis mainly interprets the rewriting phenomenon of Lin Shu's "prejudice" in the translation from two aspects: on the one hand, it classifies Lin Shu's "prejudice" according to the ideological cultural factors by using the "prejudice" theory in modern philosophical hermeneutics, which is based on the theory of "prejudice" in modern philosophical hermeneutics. To analyze and interpret some important examples of rewriting in translation; On the other hand, from the perspective of dialogue in modern philosophical hermeneutics, the author reveals the dialogue between the translator and the original author, as well as the translator and the target reader in the rewriting process. In the end, it is concluded that Lin Shu's Meat Reproach is a reasonable and successful rewriting. The rewriting is the result of the fusion of the translator and the original author, the translator and the reader of the target text to the maximum extent, and it is the concrete embodiment of the effect history.
【学位授予单位】：福州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：H315.9;I046
【共引文献】
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 金哲;平面化：后现代文化表征的多维阐释[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2010年
2 杨道宇;课程效能生成的原理研究[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2010年
3 谢云才;文本意义的诠释与翻译[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
4 王娟;理论旅行：吸收与变异[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
5 陆秀英;中国当代翻译文学系统中主体间关系的生态分析[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
6 陈怡;英语专业高年级学生汉译英能力与文本测试评分研究[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
7 耿强;文学译介与中国文学“走向世界”[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
8 高玉兰;解构主义视阈下的文化翻译研究[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
9 王厚平;美学视角下的文学翻译艺术研究[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
10 杨雪莲;传播学视角下的外宣翻译[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
本文编号：2457453
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2457453.html
