莎士比亚“十四行诗”和李商隐《无题》诗的比较研究
[Abstract]:Li Shangyin, a famous poet in the late Tang Dynasty. Long parallel prose writing, poetry literary value is very high, he and du Mu called "Xiao Li du", and Wen Tingyun known as "Wen Li". The poem without title is Li Shangyin's representative work in the poetry art of Tang Dynasty, in which his feelings and state of mind are often regarded as the true ideological connotation, expressing the sorrow of his life and the misery of the situation, and expressing the ideological state of the intellectuals of the late Tang Dynasty in a profound and delicate way. Emotional fluctuations and psychological characteristics. Shakespeare was a great dramatist and poet of the English Renaissance in the 16th century. The Renaissance era made Shakespeare the highest achievement in drama, and his sonnets reflected the spirit of that era in different ways. There are differences in space-time, country, culture and social background between Li Shangyin and Shakespeare, but they can be compared in many ways. Shakespeare's time decided that his poetry thought content is positive, the language is fresh and beautiful, full of expressive, enlightening. The aesthetic characteristics in the special historical environment of the late Tang Dynasty also profoundly influenced the style of Li Shangyin's creation. The true feelings he realized from the gap between reality and ideals were expressed in the poem without title by euphemism and twists and turns. Poetry is unified in terms of its "truth, goodness and beauty." Li Shangyin's "truth" is embodied in his persistent sincerity of Confucian traditional poetic and educational rules and his personal character; Shakespeare's "truth" is related to the influence of humanism and represents truth and faithfulness. Li Shangyin's "good" melts in the "purity" of poetry, compared with the poets of the same era, his poems are pure and elegant, and do not fall into showy obscenity; Shakespeare's goodness is contained in his deep friendship with his friends and in his praise of their noble virtues. The difference is that Li Shangyin is a kind of tragic beauty, not only wrote the pain between the obstacles of love, but also lamented the desolation of his own destiny; Shakespeare, on the other hand, sings "the Beauty of Life", which is the pursuit of eternity and light. Shakespeare's sonnet and Li Shangyin's "No title" cover a lot of natural images. Although the Chinese and foreign languages are different, the poet's living background is different, and even there is no overlap in time. But the two poets still have similarities in the use and grasp of natural images. Taking the origin of Chinese and Western culture as the starting point, that is, "the unity of heaven and man" and "the separation of subject and object", this paper explores the essential differences and fundamental reasons behind these similar "natural images". There are many similarities in Psalm structure between the two types of poems, although English and Chinese are different languages, and there are also great differences in the form of expression. English uses formal cohesive devices, and Chinese uses paratactic cohesive devices, and there are many similarities between the two types of poems in terms of the structure of the Psalms, although English and Chinese are different languages and forms of expression. However, there are many similarities in the semantic coherence of the whole structure of the Psalms, all of which adopt the Psalm model of "take-off and turn-and-turn". The creation of Shakespeare's poetry is based on inheriting the traditional sonnet, giving individual characteristics and the spirit of the times at that time. Li Shangyin, on the other hand, chose to create a poem without title, which is more suitable for his subtle and quiet style of poetry, which he pushed to the extreme.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:I0-03;I106
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 江奎;;锦瑟年华谁与度[J];新高考(高一语数外);2011年Z1期
2 龚鹏程;;学诗记事(上)[J];南阳师范学院学报;2011年07期
3 冉雪芹;;李商隐《锦瑟》新解[J];重庆广播电视大学学报;2011年03期
4 邓兴瑞;刘莹;;女性色彩的独特绽放——论杜甫、李商隐诗中的“宋玉”情怀[J];青年文学家;2011年13期
5 钟明善;;从《王翊元夫妇墓志铭》看李商隐的诗文与书法[J];西安交通大学学报(社会科学版);2011年04期
6 杜春香;;《马嵬》的给力对比[J];高中生学习(高一版);2011年02期
7 四K;;有一双小鹿眼睛的女孩[J];黄金时代(学生族);2006年03期
8 聂森;李伟;王海华;;民间剪纸艺术在艺术设计中的运用[J];青年文学家;2011年16期
9 王国彪;;韩国古代类书《芝峰类说》征引《鹤林玉露》考略[J];当代韩国;2011年02期
10 刘刚;;明末宋玉资料的辑佚、整理、编辑与其对文学宋玉的传播[J];鞍山师范学院学报;2011年03期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 余恕诚;;李白与李商隐——兼论“三李”并称[A];中国李白研究(1997年集)[C];1997年
2 李鄂荣;;“石炭”称“煤”的时代问题[A];地质学史论丛(4)[C];2002年
3 刘重来;;梁漱溟的处世养生之道[A];百家谈养生[C];2009年
4 梁晓景;;月宫“白兔捣药”神话新诂[A];中国汉画学会第十二届年会论文集[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 后毅;重在追求诗味[N];新闻出版报;2000年
2 姚建斌;佳人锦瑟何须怨[N];中国图书商报;2000年
3 本报记者 王小宁;追忆一位灵心善感的诗人[N];人民政协报;2002年
4 李静;用人生感悟古典[N];中华读书报;2007年
5 本报记者 魏小毛;嫦娥从此不寂寞[N];中国知识产权报;2007年
6 李建中;追忆中的意义生成[N];湖北日报;2011年
7 汪梦川;迦陵词学析疑(下)[N];光明日报;2007年
8 本报记者 陈旭照;民间剪纸:渐行渐远的记忆[N];洛阳日报;2006年
9 ;要创新 VS 要规则[N];中国教师报;2003年
10 丁放;中国韵文学研究的新进展[N];光明日报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 许琰;《西昆酬唱集》研究[D];西北师范大学;2007年
2 徐美秋;纪昀评点诗歌研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
3 张自华;温庭筠诗歌研究[D];广西师范大学;2011年
4 宫洪涛;论唐五代北宋的“诗人之词”[D];暨南大学;2010年
5 段莉萍;后期“西昆派”研究[D];四川大学;2004年
6 曾艳红;唐诗丝绸物事及其意象研究[D];上海师范大学;2010年
7 颜文武;“宋代诗歌学问化”研究[D];暨南大学;2010年
8 张一南;晚唐齐梁体研究[D];北京大学;2011年
9 葛红;宇文所安唐诗史方法论研究[D];西北大学;2010年
10 高超;宇文所安唐诗研究及其诗学思想的建构[D];天津师范大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 胡怡晴;莎士比亚“十四行诗”和李商隐《无题》诗的比较研究[D];东北师范大学;2010年
2 王鹏飞;海外李商隐研究[D];华东师范大学;2012年
3 罗桢婷;李商隐七律研究[D];北京大学;2011年
4 杨宏婧;论李商隐诗中的取象思维方式[D];延边大学;2011年
5 杜可可;李商隐“无题诗”的语言学视角[D];华中科技大学;2010年
6 李奇珊;温李并称研究[D];浙江大学;2010年
7 吴晓丽;论李商隐七言律诗的修辞艺术[D];华中师范大学;2011年
8 何小芬;李商隐女冠诗及其文化精神研究[D];陕西理工学院;2010年
9 钱晓琳;李商隐诗歌与骈文比较研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2009年
10 童明辉;李商隐《无题》诗接受史研究[D];湘潭大学;2005年
,本文编号:2459079
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2459079.html