当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 文艺评论论文 >

“复制”与“创造”

发布时间:2019-05-12 07:12
【摘要】:本雅明所谓"现代信息社会""以机械复制为特点"的艺术是否还需要"创造"?后现代,生活审美化、审美生活化、文学与生活合一了,文学"创造"是否成了多余之物?这是人们所关切的问题。本雅明的所谓"机械复制",复制的不是创造本身,而只是创造出来的作品。"现代信息社会"的"机械复制"并不取消"创造"。至于后现代所谓生活审美化、审美生活化、文学与生活已经合一,因此不需要再特别强调文学的"创造性",这也是一个假命题。其实,"文学与生活并未合一","艺术是生活的特异化",文学的"创造"仍然需要。
[Abstract]:Does Benjamin's art of "modern information society" characterized by mechanical reproduction still need to be "created"? Post-modern, aestheticized life, aesthetic life, literature and life in one, literature "creation" has become redundant? This is a matter of concern. Benjamin's so-called "mechanical reproduction" copies not the creation itself, but the created work. The "mechanical reproduction" of the "modern information society" does not cancel the "creation". As for the so-called aestheticization of life, aesthetic life, literature and life have been integrated, so it is no longer necessary to emphasize the "creativity" of literature, which is also a false proposition. In fact, "Literature and life are not in one", "Art is the special alienation of life", the "creation" of literature is still needed.
【作者单位】: 中国社会科学院文学研究所;
【分类号】:I01


本文编号:2475206

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2475206.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d841f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com