民族是“个别与普遍之统一的相关物”——中国马克思主义文学批评的民族观研究

发布时间：2019-05-20 15:29

【摘要】：在民族与世界的关系维度上,中国马克思主义文学批评认为,民族是"个别与普遍之统一的相关物"。民族性与世界性相互依存、对立统一,文学的民族性是它获得世界性的基础,不存在脱离了民族性的世界性,世界性寓于民族性,并通过民族性呈现出来。中国马克思主义文学批评也反对拒绝任何世界性的绝对民族性,没有完全不带普遍性的特殊性,民族性需要以世界性为坐标、视野和目的,正如普遍性要以特殊性为依存一样,特殊性也不能摆脱普遍性而独立存在,特殊性只不过是被特殊化了的普遍性。摒弃任何世界性的民族性,只不过是将自己的民族性上升为世界性,实质上是另一种形式的绝对普遍性。中国当代马克思主义文学批评既要反思文化多元主义、文化原教旨主义等各种摒弃世界性的绝对特殊性论,又要反对世界主义、天下主义等弃绝任何特殊性的普遍主义文化立场,坚持以特殊性为基础并与普遍性相统一的民族差异性。
[Abstract]:In the dimension of the relation between the nation and the world, the Chinese Marxist literary criticism is of the view that the nation is the "an individual and a universal, uniform object". The nationality and the world interdependence, to the unity of the unity, the nationality of the literature is the basis of it to get the world, does not exist the world of the nationality, the world is in the nationality, and is presented through the nationality. The Chinese Marxist literary criticism also opposes the rejection of any universal absolute nationality, is not completely non-universal, and the nationality needs to be the coordinate, view and purpose of the world, just as the universality needs to be dependent on the particularity, The particularity can not get rid of the universality and exist independently, the particularity is only the universality that is special. The rejection of any of the world's nationality is merely to raise its own national identity to the world and, in essence, the absolute universality of another form. The Chinese contemporary Marxist literary criticism should not only reflect on the cultural pluralism, the cultural fundamentalism and so on, abandon the universal absolute particularity theory, but also oppose the universal and cultural position of the world, the world, and so on, The national difference which is based on the particularity and is unified with the universality is adhered to.
【作者单位】：长江师范学院文学院;
【基金】：重庆市社会科学规划项目中特理论重点专项项目“习近平同志文艺座谈会讲话与马克思主义文艺理论的中国形态建设研究”(编号:2016ZTZD19) 中国博士后基金面上资助项目“中国马克思主义文学批评民族观的反思与建构”(编号:2016M590881)
【分类号】：I021

【相似文献】