作为现代叙事的“艺术存在论”
发布时间：2019-05-22 00:16
【摘要】：对于思辨形而上学来说,问题是"存在者在"而绝不是"无反倒不在",所以它遗忘了"存在"。此在的形而上学则以"存在的人"取代"理性的人",尝试在此在的生活世界中给予存在一个适切的说明,其结果反而是"此在在"而"存在反倒不在",基础存在论思错了"存在"。鉴于"存在事情"的急迫,海德格尔认为存在论只有走上艺术之途才能解答"存在何以可能"的问题。在思辨终止的地方,以往的哲学对现代世界失去了解释效力,而艺术作为存在的叙事则"说"出了真理,现代的本质即是"写诗",由此人们赢得了自己"存在"的命运。正是在这个意义上,"艺术何以可能"的问题成为一个存在论问题。可以说,艺术问题与存在论的融合是海德格尔为人类命运选择的一种可能性。而正是在这里,历史唯物主义表达了反对意见,"存在"绝不是一个"艺术问题",而毋宁说是一个"解放何以可能"的问题。
[Abstract]:For speculative metaphysics, the problem is that the being is in, not the other, so it forgets being. The metaphysics of this place replaces the "rational person" with "the person who exists", and tries to give an appropriate explanation of the existence in the world of life, but the result is that "this is in" and "being is not." The basic theory of existence is wrong about being. In view of the urgency of existence, Heidegger believes that existentialism can only answer the question of "how is there possible" only by embarking on the path of art. At the end of speculation, the previous philosophy lost its explanatory effect on the modern world, while art, as the narrative of existence, "said" the truth, and the essence of modern is "writing poetry", thus people won their own fate of "being". It is in this sense that the question of how art is possible has become an existential question. It can be said that the integration of artistic problems and existentialism is a possibility for Heidegger to choose for the fate of mankind. It is here that historical materialism expresses opposition. "existence" is by no means an "artistic problem", rather than a question of "how liberation is possible".
【作者单位】： 吉林大学哲学基础理论研究中心暨哲学社会学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“超越审美现代性——马克思的政治美学研究”(编号:13AZD028);国家社科基金重大项目“马克思主义政治哲学重大基础理论问题研究”(编号:15ZDB002)
【分类号】：J0-02
本文编号：2482522
[Abstract]:For speculative metaphysics, the problem is that the being is in, not the other, so it forgets being. The metaphysics of this place replaces the "rational person" with "the person who exists", and tries to give an appropriate explanation of the existence in the world of life, but the result is that "this is in" and "being is not." The basic theory of existence is wrong about being. In view of the urgency of existence, Heidegger believes that existentialism can only answer the question of "how is there possible" only by embarking on the path of art. At the end of speculation, the previous philosophy lost its explanatory effect on the modern world, while art, as the narrative of existence, "said" the truth, and the essence of modern is "writing poetry", thus people won their own fate of "being". It is in this sense that the question of how art is possible has become an existential question. It can be said that the integration of artistic problems and existentialism is a possibility for Heidegger to choose for the fate of mankind. It is here that historical materialism expresses opposition. "existence" is by no means an "artistic problem", rather than a question of "how liberation is possible".
【作者单位】： 吉林大学哲学基础理论研究中心暨哲学社会学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“超越审美现代性——马克思的政治美学研究”(编号:13AZD028);国家社科基金重大项目“马克思主义政治哲学重大基础理论问题研究”(编号:15ZDB002)
【分类号】：J0-02
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 黄华侨;;英伽登的艺术存在论[J];同济大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
2 ;[J];;年期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 黄华侨;艺术存在论的争议及其方法[D];中国美术学院;2009年
，本文编号：2482522
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2482522.html
