英汉副词性关联词语在加拿大现代女性作家作品及其汉译本中的比较研究

发布时间：2019-06-20 23:55

【摘要】：无论在现代汉语还是现代英语中,副词的研究一直备受关注。英汉副词性关联词语是特指在复句和语篇中起连接作用的副词和副词性短语,它们在副词系统中占有非常重要的地位。国内外对副词的研究比较广泛。然而,英汉副词性关联词语,尤其是英汉副词性关联词语的比较研究仍然处于起步阶段,还需要进行更广泛深入的探究。本文以2013年诺贝尔文学奖获得者加拿大人爱丽丝·门罗的9部短篇小说和加拿大“文学女皇”玛格丽特·阿特伍德的5部长篇小说及其汉译本为语料,以韩礼德和哈桑的衔接理论,韩礼德的功能语言学理论及哈里斯的语篇分析理论为理论依据,采用定量分析和定性分析方法,对其作品中英汉副词性关联词语进行分类,并从句法特征,语义关系和语篇衔接功能三个角度进行比较分析。所有分析均以真实的文本语料加以佐证。通过对比分析,我们发现英汉副词性关联词语在句法特征、语义关系及语篇衔接功能上具有相同点和不同点。本文的主要发现有:1.英汉副词性关联词语在句法位置上都可以位于句首,句中,句末和单独使用。“□+P”(“□”表示“副词性关联词语”,“P”表示“谓语”)只出现在汉译本中,而“S+P+□+PP”(“S”表示“主语”,“PP”表示“介词短语”)只出现在英语中;2.从语义关系上讲,汉英副词性关联词语都可以表时间,解释,加合,转折,结果,条件和断言关系。在英语中,其出现频率优选顺序表现为:加合时间断言解释转折条件结果(“”表示“先于”);而在汉语中,其出现频率优选顺序为:断言加合解释时间转折结果条件。3.汉英副词性关联词语主要通过语法衔接(指称,替代,省略)与词汇衔接(重复,搭配)方式实现语篇的衔接。本文研究的目的和意义在于对英汉副词性关联词语的深入研究有所帮助,使英语和汉语学习者对副词有更深入的理解,同时也为读者阅读欣赏文学作品提供新的视角。
[Abstract]:Both in modern Chinese and modern English, the study of adverbs has always attracted much attention. English and Chinese adverbs are adverbs and adverbs that play a connecting role in complex sentences and discourses, which play a very important role in adverb systems. The research on adverbs at home and abroad is more extensive. However, the comparative study of English and Chinese adverb relevance words, especially English and Chinese adverb relevance words, is still in its infancy and needs to be explored more widely. Based on the nine short stories of Canadian Alice Munro, winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2013, and the five novels of Margaret Atwood, the Queen of Literature of Canada, and their Chinese translations, based on the cohesion theory of Halliday and Hassan, Halliday's functional linguistics theory and Harris's discourse analysis theory, this paper adopts quantitative and qualitative analysis methods. This paper classifies English and Chinese adverb related words in their works, and makes a comparative analysis from three angles: syntactic features, semantic relations and textual cohesion. All the analyses are supported by real textual corpus. Through contrastive analysis, we find that English and Chinese adverb relevance words have similarities and differences in syntactic features, semantic relations and textual cohesion. The main findings of this paper are as follows: 1. English and Chinese adverbs can be located at the beginning of the sentence in syntactic position. "- P" ("-" means "adverb relevance word", "P" means "predicate") only appears in the Chinese translation, while "S-PP" ("S" means "subject", "PP" means "preposition phrase") only appears in English. From the semantic point of view, Chinese and English adverb related words can express time, explanation, addition, turning point, result, condition and assertive relationship. In English, the optimal order of occurrence frequency is as follows: the result of adjunctive time assertive interpretation transition condition ("denote" prior to "), while in Chinese, the optimal order of occurrence frequency is as follows: assertive plus combined interpretation time turning result condition. (3) in Chinese, the optimal order of occurrence frequency is as follows: (3) in Chinese, the optimal order of occurrence frequency is as follows: Chinese and English adverb relevance words mainly realize textual cohesion through grammatical cohesion (referential, substitution, omission) and lexical cohesion (repetition, collocation). The purpose and significance of this study is to be helpful to the in-depth study of English and Chinese adverb related words, so that English and Chinese learners have a deeper understanding of adverbs, and at the same time, it also provides a new perspective for readers to read and appreciate literary works.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：I046;H315.9

【参考文献】