当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 文艺评论论文 >

明清志怪小说和18世纪英国哥特小说叙事艺术比较研究

发布时间:2019-06-20 17:09
【摘要】: 明清志怪小说和18世纪英国哥特小说都是有关鬼怪的创作。鬼怪是人们臆想、虚构的产物。中国和英国有关鬼的文学作品都十分丰富。这类小说创作是对现实进行虚构的文体形式,当用小说文体去表现鬼的形象时,双重的虚构会制造出一种天马行空的自由想象的空间。明清志怪小说和18世纪英国哥特小说在各自的文学史中都属于一个亚属文类,处于边缘地位。自二十世纪八十年代以来,英国对哥特小说的研究出现日趋高涨的热潮。国内受以往政治标准和阅读思维定式的影响,对哥特小说的译介和研究显得不够充分,国内读者对其还十分陌生。虽然有论者曾对明清志怪小说进行了新的解读和诠释,但其视野多囿于民族文学内部,缺乏比较文学视野下的世界性眼光,很少从世界的范围内来看待它的重要价值和意义。 本文在比较的视野下,在分析代表作品的基础上,就两者在叙事艺术(叙事空间、叙事时间、叙事视角)方面的异同展开探讨,从而彰显它们共同的审美特性及其各自的独特性与价值。本文分五部分。绪论部分,对志怪小说和哥特小说进行概述,指出二者的可比性。第一章为“叙事空间比较”,认为二者都运用了拟实和虚幻空间叙事,这种亦真亦幻的空间能产生怪诞和恐怖的审美效果,但又同中有异。第二章为“叙事时间比较”,从叙事时间的表现形态——顺叙、倒叙、预叙三个角度分析二者的差异。第三章为“叙事视角比较”,从叙事视角的选择与运用角度来分析二者的异同,即全知叙事视角、限知叙事视角和多重叙事视角。结语部分指出这两种小说进行比较的重要性及意义。
[Abstract]:The novels of the Ming and Qing dynasties and the English Goths in the 18 th century are all about the creation of ghosts. Ghosts are the product of imagination and fiction. Chinese and British literature about ghosts is very rich. This kind of novel creation is a fictional stylistic form of reality. When the novel style is used to express the ghost image, the double virtual structure will create a kind of free imagination space. The novels of Ming and Qing dynasties and English Goths in the 18th century belong to a subcategory in the history of literature and are in a marginal position. Since 1980 s, there has been a rising upsurge in the study of Gothic novels in England. Influenced by the previous political standards and reading thinking patterns, the translation, introduction and research of Gothic novels in China is not enough, and the domestic readers are still very strange to them. Although some commentators have made a new interpretation and interpretation of the novels of the Ming and Qing dynasties, their horizons are mostly confined to the national literature, lack of a worldwide vision from the perspective of comparative literature, and rarely look at its important value and significance from the perspective of the world. From the perspective of comparison and on the basis of analyzing the representative works, this paper discusses the similarities and differences between the two in narrative art (narrative space, narrative time, narrative perspective), so as to highlight their common aesthetic characteristics and their uniqueness and value. This paper is divided into five parts. In the introduction part, the author summarizes the strange novels and goth novels, and points out the comparability between them. The first chapter is the comparison of narrative space, which holds that both of them use realistic and illusory space narration, which can produce grotesque and scary aesthetic effects, but they are different from each other. The second chapter is the comparison of narrative time, which analyzes the differences between the two from the three angles of narration, flashback and pre-narration. The third chapter is the comparison of narrative perspectives, which analyzes the similarities and differences between them from the perspective of choice and application of narrative perspectives, that is, omniscience narrative perspective, limited narrative perspective and multiple narrative perspectives. The conclusion part points out the importance and significance of the comparison between the two novels.
【学位授予单位】:贵州师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2009
【分类号】:I106.4;I0-03

【相似文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 孔聪;明清志怪小说和18世纪英国哥特小说叙事艺术比较研究[D];贵州师范大学;2009年



本文编号:2503384

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2503384.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户decfe***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com