“科学”与“距离”:“理论之后”的伊格尔顿研究关键词

发布时间：2018-01-20 23:33

本文关键词： 理论反思科学意识形态距离伊格尔顿　出处：《山东社会科学》2013年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：如何把握伊格尔顿近年来出现的所谓"神学转向",如何平衡其学术研究中的科学理念与形而上探讨中的信仰诉求,是国内伊格尔顿研究必须首先解决的问题。在《理论之后》一书中同时出现对理论的猛烈批判和热情期待,表明"理论"秉承一种保持距离的、反思的、既置身其中又超然物外的逻辑。反思的距离是科学与研究对象之间的距离。理解了"科学"二字在不同阶段的不同含义,就易于解释伊格尔顿数十年来学术焦点的转换历程。伊格尔顿谈论政治、宗教、伦理、意识形态和文学问题的最终目的是要在一定的距离之外反思我们的生存境遇,他近年来所做的努力是和现状保持距离的种种尝试。
[Abstract]:How to grasp the so-called "theological turn" that Eagleton has appeared in recent years, and how to balance the scientific idea in his academic research with the belief demand in metaphysical discussion. It is a problem that must be solved first in the domestic Eagleton study. In the book after Theory, there is a fierce criticism and enthusiastic expectation of theory, which shows that "theory" inherits a kind of keeping distance and introspection. The distance of reflection is the distance between science and the object of study, and the different meanings of the word "science" at different stages are understood. It's easy to explain Eagleton's decades of shifting academic focus. Eagleton talks about politics, religion, ethics. The ultimate purpose of ideological and literary problems is to reflect on our living conditions beyond a certain distance. His efforts in recent years are attempts to keep distance from the present situation.
【作者单位】：山东大学文艺美学研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“新时期基本文学理论观念的演进与论争研究”(项目编号:10BZW011)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I561.06
【正文快照】： 近年来,在文学领域大名鼎鼎的伊格尔顿在形而上学领域颇多建树,甚至与新无神论者辩论上帝是否存在,出版了《神圣的恐怖》(2005)、《理性、信仰与革命:对上帝争论的反思》(2009)、《论邪恶》(2010)等一系列著作。国内有学者因此提出:伊格尔顿在2000年之后明确地出现了“神学转

【参考文献】