《绿绿的草，流动的水》二元对立的解构

发布时间：2018-01-24 06:39

本文关键词： 《绿绿的草流动的水》二元对立解构主义　出处：《哈尔滨工业大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：托马斯·金在北美享有“当代印第安作家之王”的美誉，因他的作品往往带有鲜明的印第安族裔性。作为金最负盛名的一部小说，《绿绿的草，流动的水》带有鲜明的印第安族裔性。它讲述了一群当代印第安人在西方主流文化的冲击下，迷失身份，寻找身份，继而重建身份的过程。本文运用解构主义的批评方法，旨在分析金如何在《绿绿的草，流动的水》中对西方传统的二元对立范畴进行解构，从而达到颠覆白人的霸权思想和等级观念，并实现彰显印第安传统文化的目的。“二元对立”是西方人看待世界的基本方式。它认为任何事物都可以一分为二，彼此相互对立。因此，白人与有色人种，人与自然，书写与口述等构成了二元对立的范畴，且前者统治后者。二元对立的实质是一种等级制度，解构主义方法则对这种等级制度进行颠覆，从而实现消解西方中心和反抗文化霸权的目的。论文分为五个部分。导论部分介绍托马斯·金的文学成就以及《绿绿的草，流动的水》的文学价值；回顾国内外评论家对该小说的不同解读；简要介绍结构主义以及论文的结构安排。主体部分分为三章，分别从白人和印第安人，人和自然，书写和口述这三组二元对立的范畴出发，分析金如何对其进行解构。第一章讨论金对白人和印第安人这组二元对立的解构。通过改写白人形象，重塑印第安人形象，金使白人丧失了自认为高于印第安人的优越感，彰显了印第安人的聪明才智。第二章分析金对人和自然这组二元对立的解构。通过揭露白人对自然的压迫，展现印第安人与自然的和谐相处，金谴责了白人的自然观，赞颂了印第安人的自然观。第三章分析金对书写和口述这组二元对立的解构。通过颠覆西方书写的权威，突出口述形式的优势，金揭露了西方书写形式的缺陷，凸显了印第安传统的口述文化。论文的结论部分简要回顾了整篇论文的主要内容，说明通过对上述三组二元对立的解构，金成功地颠覆了白人的霸权思想和等级观念，，并宣传了印第安的传统文化。从解构主义视角出发研究《绿绿的草，流动的水》，不仅有助于读者更好地理解文本，而且有助于读者看清西方主流文化的排他性，同时也促使读者领略到印第安这一传统文化的独特魅力。
[Abstract]:Thomas King is known in North America as the "King of Contemporary Indian Writers," because his works tend to have a distinct Indian ethnocent.As one of King's most famous novels, Green Grass. The flowing Water is characterized by distinct Indian ethnography. It tells the process of a group of contemporary Indians who lost their identity and then rebuilt their identity under the impact of the western mainstream culture. This paper uses deconstructionism to analyze how Jin deconstructs the traditional binary opposites of the West in Green Grass, flowing Water. In order to subvert the hegemonic thought and hierarchy of white people and realize the purpose of displaying Indian traditional culture "dualism" is the basic way for westerners to view the world. It holds that anything can be divided into two. Therefore, white and colored people, man and nature, writing and speaking constitute the category of dualistic opposition, and the former rule the latter. The essence of dualistic opposition is a hierarchical system. Deconstructionism subverts this hierarchical system, thus achieving the purpose of dispelling the western center and resisting cultural hegemony. The paper is divided into five parts. The introduction introduces Thomas King's literary achievements and the literary value of Green Grass, flowing Water; Review the different interpretations of the novel by domestic and foreign critics; A brief introduction to structuralism and the structure of the thesis. The main part is divided into three chapters, starting from the white and Indian, human and natural, writing and dictating these three groups of binary opposites. The first chapter discusses how King deconstructs the white and Indian dualistic opposition. By rewriting the white image, the author rebuilds the Indian image. Gold makes white people lose their sense of superiority over Indians and demonstrates their intelligence. Chapter two analyzes King's deconstruction of the dualistic opposition between man and nature. By exposing the white man's oppression of nature. Showing Indian harmony with nature, King condemned the white man's view of nature. The third chapter analyzes King's deconstruction of the dualistic opposition of writing and dictation. By subverting the authority of Western writing and highlighting the advantages of oral form, King exposes the defects of Western writing. The conclusion of the thesis briefly reviews the main contents of the whole paper and explains the deconstruction of the above three groups of dualistic opposition. King succeeded in subverting white hegemony and hierarchy and propagating traditional Indian culture. From the perspective of deconstruction, the study of "Green grass, flowing water" is not only helpful for readers to understand the text better, but also for readers to see the exclusiveness of western mainstream culture. At the same time, it also promotes readers to appreciate the unique charm of Indian traditional culture.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I711.074

【共引文献】