论文学史学的人类学范式及其演进

发布时间：2018-03-18 06:45

本文选题：文学史学　切入点：人类学　出处：《理论学刊》2013年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：文学史学的人类学范式经历了建构、危机和生机三个历史阶段。19世纪中后期,文学史学借鉴人类学的种族论、进化论和科学方法论建构起文学史学的人类学范式,经过欧洲文学史家的开拓,文学史学人类学范式发展到顶峰阶段,对20世纪的中国文学史学产生了深刻影响。进入20世纪,文学史学人类学范式遭遇到后现代主义、形式主义、接受美学等文化思潮的口诛笔伐,陷入了危机。20世纪后期,文学人类学兴起,文学史学的人类学范式重新获得了生机:一方面,文学人类学的整体文学史观和比较方法论推动了文学史学的进一步发展;另一方面,文学人类学的普遍主义和相对主义思维方式、以及文学人类学中国学派的"四重证据法"和"文化阐释"又让文学史学面临诸多的理论与实践问题。
[Abstract]:The anthropological paradigm of literary historiography has experienced three historical stages: construction, crisis and vitality. In the middle and late 19th century, literary historiography has constructed the anthropological paradigm of literary history by drawing lessons from anthropology's racial theory, evolutionary theory and scientific methodology. Through the development of European literary historians, the anthropological paradigm of literary history has reached its peak stage, which has had a profound impact on Chinese literary historiography in 20th century. In 20th century, the paradigm of anthropology of literary history encountered postmodernism and formalism. In the late 20th century, the literary anthropology rose, and the anthropological paradigm of literary history regained its vitality: on the one hand, The overall view and comparative methodology of literary anthropology promote the further development of literary history, on the other hand, the universalism and relativism of literary anthropology, And the four-fold evidence Law and Cultural interpretation of Chinese School of Literary Anthropology make literature history face many theoretical and practical problems.
【作者单位】：贵州民族大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“新世纪文艺论争中的重大理论问题研究”(项目编号:13XZW016)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I109

【参考文献】