《蝇王》的解构主义释读

发布时间：2018-04-04 22:32

本文选题：解构主义　切入点：延异　出处：《华北电力大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：《蝇王》是当代英国小说家威廉·戈尔丁的经典作品，该书出版于1954年，讲述了一个情节简单但是寓意深刻的故事，作者以寓言故事的形式深刻揭示了人性恶这一主题。自该小说出版以来，《蝇王》引起了国内外学者的广泛关注，大量的专著和评论文章从神话原型、心理分析、女性主义、叙事策略等角度对其进行剖析，但是从解构主义视角解读该文本的却几乎没有。本文运用解构主义批评理论，对小说中存在的大量二元对立进行解构，，颠覆经典二元对立中的等级关系，同时还借用解构主义中的“延异”观点分析了小说中存在的不确定性以及模糊性。本文共分为五章。第一章是引言部分，简要介绍了戈尔丁与《蝇王》，回顾了国内国外对《蝇王》的评论，并概述了解构主义理论。第二章主要从解构主义“延异”的观点出发，分析了小说中“火”与“海螺”象征意义的不确定性以及“笑声”与“野兽”意义的模糊性，从而对传统的解读进行了颠覆。第三章分析了故事中的两组颠覆，即对儿童天真形象的颠覆，对逻各斯中心主义与菲勒斯中西主义的颠覆。该分析消解了儿童优于成年人，男性优于女性的传统二元对立观点。第四章分析了作品中两组二元对立的融合部分，即善与恶的融合，理性与非理性的融合。通过分析发现，人是善与恶、理性与非理性的融合，二元对立之间并没有明确的界限。第五章是结论。结语对上述章节进行了归纳和总结，通过对《蝇王》的解构主义释读发现该小说体现了作者对人性的一种矛盾观点，即人是善与恶的融合，这也是对该小说传统人性恶主题解读的一种颠覆。解构主义释读不仅能丰富小说的内涵和主旨,而且将会引发读者对人性更深刻的关注和思考。
[Abstract]:The Lord of the flies is the classic work of William Golding, a contemporary British novelist, published in 1954, which tells a simple but profound story about the theme of human nature in the form of fables.Since the publication of the novel, Lord of the flies has attracted wide attention from scholars at home and abroad. A large number of monographs and commentaries have analyzed it from the perspectives of mythology prototype, psychoanalysis, feminism, narrative strategy, etc.However, there are few interpretations of the text from the perspective of deconstruction.Based on the theory of deconstruction criticism, this paper deconstructs a large number of binary opposites in novels, subverts the hierarchical relations in classical binary antagonism, and analyses the novel by using the viewpoint of "persistence" in deconstruction.Uncertainty and fuzziness.This paper is divided into five chapters.The first chapter is the introduction, briefly introduces Golding and Lord of the flies, reviews the comments of the Lord of the flies at home and abroad, and summarizes the deconstruction theory.The second chapter analyzes the uncertainty of the symbolic meaning of "fire" and "conch" and the fuzziness of the meaning of "laughter" and "beast" from the viewpoint of deconstructionism, thus subverting the traditional interpretation.Chapter three analyzes two groups of subversion in the story, that is, the subversion of the naive image of children, the subversion of logos centrism and Philistinism.The analysis dispels the traditional dichotomy of children over adults and men over women.Chapter four analyzes the fusion of two groups of binary opposites in the works, that is, the fusion of good and evil, and the fusion of rationality and irrationality.Through analysis, it is found that there is no clear boundary between human being and evil, rationality and irrationality.Chapter five is the conclusion.The conclusion sums up and summarizes the above chapters. Through the deconstruction interpretation of the Lord of the flies, it is found that the novel embodies the author's contradictory view of human nature, that is, man is the fusion of good and evil.This is also a subversion of the traditional theme of human nature in this novel.Deconstruction interpretation not only enriches the connotation and purport of the novel, but also causes readers to pay more attention to human nature.
【学位授予单位】：华北电力大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：I561.074

【参考文献】