缺席人物的在场：《玻璃动物园》中父亲角色研究

发布时间：2018-04-13 14:25

本文选题：田纳西·威廉姆斯 + 《玻璃动物园》　；参考：《上海外国语大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：田纳西·威廉姆斯，原名托马斯·托尼尔·威廉斯，是美国二战后最为有名望的戏剧家之一。作为其首部大获成功的自传体戏剧《玻璃动物园》，自问世以来一直备受观众和评论家的关注，对当代喜剧影响颇大。但遗憾的是，，鲜有人从弗洛伊德的精神分析学及德里达的解构主义角度来分析该喜剧，特别是该剧中出现的“第五个人物”温菲尔德先生。鉴于此，本文从这两个角度对剧中在场及缺席的人物进行分析得出结论：温菲尔德家的悲剧根源正是那位看似缺席却时刻能被观众明显感觉到的“第五人物”温菲尔德先生。本文从三个方面展开对该剧进行分析。文章先分析了剧中被温菲尔德先生抛弃的三位家庭成员：母亲阿曼达是位有激情的妇女，但总生活在对自己少年时代的回忆中；女儿罗拉因为太敏感自己轻微的跛脚而将自己与外部世界隔离；本剧的叙述者，自私的儿子汤姆虽是家中的顶梁柱却总是梦想着离家出走。本文通过分析指出这个家庭及家庭各个成员的的悲剧源于离家出走，抛妻弃儿的温菲尔德先生。接下来，本文应用弗洛伊德的精神分析法对各个家庭人物进行解剖，指出形成其古怪性格及行为的原因是他们在对现实幻灭后所采取的自我保护机制，而他们失望的根源同样是来自缺席的温菲尔德先生。通过对在场及缺席人物的分析，本文彰显了该剧中缺席较之在场的优势地位，同时提出假设：如果缺席的温菲尔德先生也在场，剧情及人物命运会如何发展？根据德里达的解构主义关于在场和缺席这对二元对立的相关理论假设，本文证明德里达理论假设的可行性。基于以上的相关分析，本文向观众呈现了一个更为真实的温菲尔德先生——虽缺席，但无时无刻不在影响着在场的人物及剧情发展，他才是整个戏剧发展的导线，他才是导致该剧人物悲剧的真正原因。
[Abstract]:Tennessee Williams, formerly known as Thomas Tornier Williams, is the United States after World War II, one of the most famous dramatist. As the first major success of the autobiographical drama "glass zoo >, since much of the audience and critics, of considerable contemporary comedy. But unfortunately, few people study and Derrida from the Perspective of deconstruction the spirit of Freud to analyze the comedy, especially the play" fifth characters "of Mr. Winfield. In view of this, this paper analyzes the conclusion of the present and absent characters from the two aspects: Winfield's tragedy is the seemingly absent but always can be the audience clearly feel the" fifth the character of Mr. Winfield. "
This paper from the three aspects of the play are analyzed. The paper first analyses the three family members of Mr. Winfield's mother abandoned: Amanda is a passionate woman, but life in their childhood memories; daughter Laura too sensitive his light and his lame and external the world of isolation; the narrator, selfish son Tom is home to Ding Liangzhu has always dreamed of running away. This article points out that all the family and the family tragedy originated from the runaways, left his wife abandoned Mr. Winfield.
Next, by using the method of Freud's psychoanalysis were dissected for each family characters, pointed out the reason forming the eccentric personality and behavior are they in the reality after the lost self protection mechanism and the source of their disappointment is also absent from Mr. Winfield. Through the analysis of the presence and absence of figures, this paper demonstrates the the play is the presence of absence of dominant position, and puts forward the hypothesis: if Mr. Winfield was absent, the story and the fate of the characters will be how to develop? According to Derrida's deconstruction about the presence and absence of the binary opposition between the two theoretical assumptions, this paper proves the feasibility of Derrida theory hypothesis.
Based on the above analysis, this paper presents to the audience a more real MR Winfield, despite the absence, but not in the presence of every hour and moment affects the characters and plot development, he is the conductor of the drama development, he is the real cause of the drama tragedy.

【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I712.073

【参考文献】