花踪文学奖与马华文学典律重构

发布时间：2018-05-02 11:33

本文选题：花踪文学奖 + 马华文学　；参考：《暨南大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着上个世纪九十年代一场史无前例的文学论争的爆发，马华文学进入了一个新的典律重构期。在马华现实主义传统与现代主义典律交锋的漩涡以及众声喧哗的焦虑与期待中，作为马华文坛标志性大奖的花踪文学奖所给出的马华文学何处的指向是值得思虑的。为了避免主观性与片面性的干扰，继而客观、公正地还原花踪文学奖在九十年代以降马华文学典律重构期中的位置与作用，本文拟将其放置于历时的、宏观的文学场域与权力关系中思考。首先回顾马华文学对马来文学的抗争、马华现实主义传统的典律化演变、现实主义与现代主义的纠缠与抗衡。以此为脉络，，于众声喧哗的“典律之争”中引出花踪文学奖的出场并简要介绍花踪文学奖的背景、历程与属性定位。其后考察花踪文学奖介入并影响马华文学典律重构进程的合法性与可能性：即如何通过权力资本的累积与分配来掌控文学典律的话语权；如何通过评审机制中的文学批评影响文学典律的审美演绎；如何通过选辑、论述环节支撑强化典律的地位，以至于潜移默化影响作家创作与大众接受，进而重塑有别于马华现实主义传统的“现代主义”典律。最后回归到具体的获奖文本创作上，从本土观、文学观与美学观三个维度的嬗变透析“现代主义”典律的内涵意义。
[Abstract]:With the outbreak of an unprecedented literary debate in 1990's, Malaysia's literature entered a new period of canonical reconstruction. In the whirlpool between Mahua realism tradition and modernist canon, and in the anxiety and expectation of all voices, it is worth thinking about where the Flower track Literature Award, which is the landmark prize in the literary world of Mahua, has given. In order to avoid the interference of subjectivity and one-sidedness, and then objectively and impartially restore the position and function of the Flower track Literature Award in the 1990s, this paper intends to place it in the diachronic. Thinking about the macroscopic literature field and power relation. Firstly, it reviews the struggle against Malay literature in Malay literature, the canonical evolution of Mahua realism tradition, and the entanglement and counterbalance between realism and modernism. In this context, this paper introduces the appearance of the Flower Trace Literature Award and briefly introduces the background, course and attribute orientation of the Flower Trace Literature Award in the noisy "dispute over the Code and Law". After that, the author examines the legitimacy and possibility of the process of reconstruction of the literary canon and law of Ma Hua literature that is, how to control the discourse right of literary canon through the accumulation and distribution of power capital; How to influence the aesthetic deduction of literary canon through the literary criticism in the evaluation mechanism, how to support and strengthen the position of canon through selection, so as to influence the writer's creation and popular acceptance, Then remoulding the canonical law of "modernism" which is different from Ma Hua's realistic tradition. Finally, it returns to the concrete winning text creation, analyzes the connotation meaning of "modernism" canonical law from the three dimensions of local view, literature view and aesthetic view.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：I1

【相似文献】