解构主义视角下E.E.卡明斯的诗歌

发布时间：2024-11-20 08:02

　　卡明斯是美国现代诗坛颇具争议性的人物。有评论家推崇并称道他独特的诗风和别具一格的写诗技巧，认为他是一位敢于突破常规和力求标新立异的美国现代诗人；也有许多文学评论家谴责他的诗风怪诞荒谬，不按章法，叫人半懂不懂，甚至不知所云。在中国，关于卡明斯及其诗作的研究自二十世纪八十年代开始逐渐引起学者们的兴趣和关注，主要针对卡明斯诗作中不同寻常的排版、奇形怪状的拼写、特殊迥异的语法规则等展开讨论和研究，也可谓仁者见仁，智者见智。本论文主要借助于法国学者德里达的解构主义理论从延异、撒播、补充、踪迹等角度入手探讨卡明斯诗歌中的独特性、创造性和思想性，并且认为这些特点是卡明斯诗歌具有非凡魅力和无穷意味的原因，是卡明斯诗歌之所以具有争议性的内在依据。卡明斯风格体现在卡明斯诗作中的字里行间，体现在他对本真的自然界和真正属于人的世界的思考和再认识，这也是他诗歌创作的主旨和核心。从根本上讲，卡明斯确实有独创性，因为他恪守人之所以为人的价值观，强调人在大千世界的唯一性和特殊性；卡明斯很反叛，因为他把绘画创作中的一些理念借鉴到诗歌写作中，并接受立体主义、达达主义等的影响，随心所欲地造词、大小写、排列组合、句法变异等等，...

【文章页数】：86 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 E. E. Cummings's life and poetry
    1.2 E. E. Cummings in America and China
        1.2.1 E. E. Cummings in America
        1.2.2 E. E. Cummings in China
    1.3 The research method and its value
    1.4 The thematic structure of the paper
Chapter 2 Theory of Deconstruction and Literature
    2.1 Jacques Derrida's theory of deconstruction
        2.1.1 Dissemination:undecidable
        2.1.2 Differance:jeu as its nature
        2.1.3 Supplement and trace
    2.2 A deconstructive consideration of literature
        2.2.1 A focus:the intentionalitv of writers and the meanings of the texts
        2.2.2 Temporality and iterability
        2.2.3 Signifier and signified: constituted, but not constitutive
    2.3 Theory of deconstruction and E. E. Cummings's poems
Chapter 3 A Deconstructive Reading of E. E. Cummings's Poems
    3.1 A critical view of E. E. Cummings's poems
        3.1.1 Word play: Vague and strange
        3.1.2 Uniqueness: Sophisticated and different
        3.1.3 A Deconstructive approach
    3.2 The characteristics of E. E. Cummings's Poems
        3.2.1 Original
            3.2.1.1 Deconstruction of words and grammar: Denying Phonecentrism
            3.2.1.2 An analysis of "r-p-o-p-h-e-s-s-a-g-r", "the", etc
            3.2.1.3 E. E. Cummings-style:an original way of describing the chaotic immediacy of sensuous experience
        3.2.2 Anti-traditional
            3.2.2.1 Deconstruction of sentences: Function of "difference"
            3.2.2.2 An analysis of "Buffalo Bill's", "O sweet spontaneous", etc
            3.2.2.3 Changeability and "unreadable": playing with language
        3.2.3 Philosophical
            3.2.3.1 Deconstruction of texts: Intentionality to blur the difference between philosophy and literature
            3.2.3.2 An analysis of "l(a"," Me up at does", etc.
            3.2.3.3 Fragmentation of thought: mystical and anarchistic beliefs
Chapter 4 Conclusion
Notes
References
Appendix
Papers Published



本文编号：4012283