《白象似的群山》中的跨性别交际失误分析
发布时间：2025-03-17 23:29
本文综合运用伯明翰学派话语分析、礼貌原则、合作原则和批评性语篇分析方法,对海明威的短篇故事《白象似的群山》中男女主人公的言语行为进行了分析,旨在揭示跨性别交际失误的产生过程及其潜在的社会文化因素。 本研究选取此故事中14段对话,从交际目的、方式及内容三方面入手进行分析男女主人公的言语行为,指出跨性别交际失误不仅是由于彼此言语行为的不同,也是由于彼此社会地位的差异导致的。同时,本研究总结了容易产生跨性别交际失误的区域和修复方法。女性方面,应该意识到自己在交际中的地位,并设法达到交际目的。同时,男性也需要根据不同的语境调整自己的话语风格。 此项研究有助于人们对日常交际的理解,从而减少交际失误的发生。女性应该学会运用交际策略,实现其交际目的。对《白象似的群山》中男女主人公言语行为的分析有助于人们更客观地理解文学语言,对文学欣赏具有一定的借鉴意义;在英语教学中,教师应当帮助学生们意识到语言使用的性别差异,提高其跨性别交际能力。
【文章页数】：119 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
内容提要
Synopsis
Introduction
Chapter One Literature Review
1.1 Miscommunication
1.1.1 Definition of Miscommunication
1.1.2 Cross-gender Miscommunication
1.2 Speech Act Theory
1.2.1 Illocutionary Acts and Perlocutionary Acts
1.2.2 Direct and Indirect Speech Acts
1.3 A Feminist Perspective on Cross-gender Miscommunication
1.3.1 Women’s Position in Society
1.3.2 Influence of Feminism on Language
1.4 Related Studies Abroad
1.5 Related Studies in China
Chapter Two Methodology
2.1 Data Collection
2.2 The Birmingham School Discourse Analysis
2.3 The Cooperative Principle and the Politeness Principle
2.4 CDA Methods
Chapter Three Data Analysis and Implications
3.1 A Brief Introduction to Hills Like White Elephants
3.2 Process of Cross-gender Miscommunication
3.3 Causes of Cross-gender Miscommunication
3.3.1 Gender Difference in the Purposes of Talk
3.3.2 Gender Difference in the Styles of Talk
3.3.3 Gender Difference in the Contents of Talk
3.4 Areas of Potential Miscommunication
3.4.1 Minimal Responses
3.4.2 Questions
3.4.3 Topic Shift
3.4.4 Relevance between Utterances
3.5 Repairs in Cross-gender Miscommunication
3.5.1 Recognizing the Validity of Differences
3.5.2 Increasing Shared Knowledge
3.5.3 Reforming Language Use
3.6 Implications
3.6.1 Implications for Communication
3.6.2 Implications for the Appreciation of Literature
3.6.3 Implications for the Feminist Study
3.6.4 Implications for English Teaching
Conclusion
References
Appendix
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
导师及作者简介
本文编号：4035643
【文章页数】：119 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
内容提要
Synopsis
Introduction
Chapter One Literature Review
1.1 Miscommunication
1.1.1 Definition of Miscommunication
1.1.2 Cross-gender Miscommunication
1.2 Speech Act Theory
1.2.1 Illocutionary Acts and Perlocutionary Acts
1.2.2 Direct and Indirect Speech Acts
1.3 A Feminist Perspective on Cross-gender Miscommunication
1.3.1 Women’s Position in Society
1.3.2 Influence of Feminism on Language
1.4 Related Studies Abroad
1.5 Related Studies in China
Chapter Two Methodology
2.1 Data Collection
2.2 The Birmingham School Discourse Analysis
2.3 The Cooperative Principle and the Politeness Principle
2.4 CDA Methods
Chapter Three Data Analysis and Implications
3.1 A Brief Introduction to Hills Like White Elephants
3.2 Process of Cross-gender Miscommunication
3.3 Causes of Cross-gender Miscommunication
3.3.1 Gender Difference in the Purposes of Talk
3.3.2 Gender Difference in the Styles of Talk
3.3.3 Gender Difference in the Contents of Talk
3.4 Areas of Potential Miscommunication
3.4.1 Minimal Responses
3.4.2 Questions
3.4.3 Topic Shift
3.4.4 Relevance between Utterances
3.5 Repairs in Cross-gender Miscommunication
3.5.1 Recognizing the Validity of Differences
3.5.2 Increasing Shared Knowledge
3.5.3 Reforming Language Use
3.6 Implications
3.6.1 Implications for Communication
3.6.2 Implications for the Appreciation of Literature
3.6.3 Implications for the Feminist Study
3.6.4 Implications for English Teaching
Conclusion
References
Appendix
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
导师及作者简介
本文编号：4035643
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wxchuangz/4035643.html
