二人转13子集渊源考
发布时间:2018-03-26 04:48
本文选题:业界权威 切入点:演出形式 出处:《戏剧文学》2014年11期
【摘要】:正近年媒体围绕二人转的很多论争,其分歧焦点集中在人们对二人转形式的理解上。人们通常把二人转理解为一种固定的演出形式(即传统的"双玩意"。因此肖鹰等人认为今天舞台演出的不是二人转,而是"二人秀",获很多业界权威人士的支持)。这是一个重大的误区。自古二人转就是"一树多枝",并且在新的历史条件下不断发出新枝。把二人转固定为一种样式,而排斥其他子集样式,是对二人转文化的曲解。鉴于此问题已关系二人转何去何从,本文对此问题作一番
[Abstract]:In recent years, there has been a lot of controversy in the media around the two-man revolution. The focus of their differences is on people's understanding of the form of the two-person rotation, which is usually understood as a fixed form of performance (that is, the traditional "double play". Therefore, Xiao Ying and others believe that today's stage performance is not a two-person rotation. But the "two-person show", which has the support of many authoritative figures in the industry. This is a major mistake. Since ancient times, Errenzhuan has been "one tree with many branches," and has been issuing new branches under the new historical conditions. The rejection of other subsets is a misinterpretation of the culture of Errenzhuan. In view of the fact that this problem has been related to the future of Errenzhuan, this paper makes some comments on this issue.
【作者单位】: 吉林省艺术研究院;
【分类号】:J825
【相似文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 刘海燕邋金e黣,
本文编号:1666400
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/xijuwudaolunwen/1666400.html