“花雅之争”研究中的歧见与困境

发布时间：2018-07-01 15:54

本文选题：花雅之争 + 名实　；参考：《戏剧艺术》2014年06期

【摘要】："花雅之争"是清代戏曲史的重要术语。目前,学界对"花雅之争"的观照越来越全面,但将这些研究成果统而观之则会发现,"花雅之争"的提法不但存在名实不符的问题,而且遮蔽了花、雅之间的融合以及花部之间远为激烈的竞争关系。花部、雅部在城市与农村,南方与北方,在宫廷、文人、民间不同的文化空间里都有其错综复杂的发展轨迹,"花雅之争"不足以概括当时全国戏曲发展的多面相。"花雅之争"研究中的这些"歧见",恰恰完成了对"花雅之争"术语的解构。
[Abstract]:"the dispute of flower elegance" is an important term in the history of opera in Qing Dynasty. At present, the academic circles pay more and more attention to the argument of "flower and elegance". However, if the research results are taken as a whole, it will be found that the formulation of "the dispute of flower and elegance" has not only the problem of discrepancy between the name and reality, but also obscured the flower. The fusion of elegance and the far-fierce competition between flower departments. The flower department, the elegant department in the city and the countryside, the south and the north, in the court, the literati, the folk different cultural space all has its complex development trace, "the flower elegant dispute" is not enough to generalize the national opera development multi-facet. These differences of opinion in the study of the dispute of flower elegance have precisely completed the deconstruction of the terms of the dispute of flower elegance.
【作者单位】：河北师范大学;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“元曲曲牌传播研究”(11CZW037)相关性成果
【分类号】：J809.2

【参考文献】