以文化为视角重解奥尔夫音乐教育——兼及中国传统文化观的时代归复

发布时间：2018-07-10 02:29

本文选题：奥尔夫 + 音乐教育　；参考：《音乐创作》2017年05期

【摘要】：教育学界对奥尔夫的研究硕果累累,却聚讼纷纭,而教育实践中,奥教听堂办的"火热",却档次不一。由此引带出一系列问题:奥尔夫音乐教育形成的文化背景及其文化身份不清,与中国传统文化关联不明等。本文通过对奥尔夫音乐教育思想及其教学法人文性内涵的学理阐释,将其与中国传统文化进行比较与对照,进而提出在21世纪"全球化"、"多元化"时代主题下,奥尔夫音乐教育被赋予了更加无限丰富的内涵——它作为弘扬民族音乐文化,彰显文化多样性,实现民族文化认同的教育,与中国传统文化有"无限"内在关联,欲读懂"奥尔夫",需"更上一层楼",唯有将其放置在多元音乐文化语境中,阐释、复原、整合中西文化的"不同之不同"(而非"不及之不同"),方能更好的实现跨文化音乐教育的目标。
[Abstract]:Although the research on Orf has been fruitful in the field of education, the educational practice is of different grades. This leads to a series of problems: the cultural background and cultural identity of Orff's music education are not clear, and the connection with Chinese traditional culture is unclear. Based on the theoretical explanation of Orff's music education thought and its humanistic connotation of teaching method, this paper compares and contrasts it with traditional Chinese culture, and then puts forward the theme of "globalization" and "pluralism" in the 21st century. Orf's music education has been endowed with a more limitless connotation. As an education to carry forward national music culture, highlight cultural diversity, and realize national cultural identity, Orff's music education has an "infinite" internal relationship with Chinese traditional culture. In order to understand "Orff," we need to "climb another high building," and only place it in a multi-cultural context to explain and restore it. The goal of cross-cultural music education can be better realized by integrating "different" of Chinese and Western cultures (rather than "less than different").
【作者单位】：内江师范学院音乐学院;
【分类号】：G642;J60-4

【参考文献】