《诗经》乐器考释

发布时间：2018-05-21 18:37

本文选题：《诗经》 + 乐器　；参考：《华中师范大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本文以《诗经》中的乐器为研究对象。其具体研究思路是：以《诗》原典为依据，通过对经学文献资料、出土文物实物资料、甲文、金文、古文字资料以及现代研究等资料中乐器资料的考察与研究，重点做了以下几项工作：1、梳理了历代诗经学家有关《诗》中乐器的文献资料；2、总结了《诗》中乐器问题的源流和演变；3、探讨了《诗》中几种乐器的实状与初形，尤其是对吹奏乐器“龠”及与其他竹类吹管乐器的关系做了重点的讨论。总之，本文是以诗经学为背景，结合文献学、考古学和文字学的综合考据研究。本文分四章。第一章为绪论，主要讨论了两个问题：一是简述《诗经》研究背景；二是阐述《诗经》乐器研究状况及其主要问题，提出本文所要讨论的三个主要问题。第二章为《诗经·周颂·有瞽》“应田县鼓”中“应”、“田”的考述，重点是对“田”的考述。首先是对“田”的历史争论进行梳理，从毛、郑的分歧与依据入手；对郑派学者的辨证；毛派学者的辨证；非毛非郑派学者的观点及辨证几个方面进行讨论，指出“田”应与建鼓有关；其次，在此基础上对考古发现的建鼓进行形制及意义的分析，得出“田”为大鼓，即建鼓，是有“通神”作用，与上天进行沟通的导引之鼓，“应”为小鼓，悬于“田”两侧的结论。第三章为《诗经·小雅·鼓钟》“以雅以南，以|e不僭”中“雅、南、|e”的考述。本章讨论分为两个方面：一是据《诗经》学研究年代进行划分，从汉代学者、宋代学者、清代学者的论述三个部分对“雅”、“南”、“|e”古代文献进行综论；二是对“南”进行古文字学考察，郭沫若认为其为乐器，唐兰认为其为瓦器，陈致认为其为竹器。通过对以上说法的比较，得出“南”作为乐器，在原始社会为竹制之乐器，至石器时代，由瓦制乐器代替，到了青铜器时代，发展为青铜制品钟旽之类乐器的结论。从而本文认为“雅”、“南”为乐名，“|e”兼雅南，与上琴瑟钟磐节奏齐同。第四章为《诗经》竹类乐器的考述。首先据甲文和金文释“龠”，认为其为最早的斜吹单管乐器，实状为贾湖出土的斜吹单管乐管，即“贾湖古龠”，后成为意符，，为竹类乐器之“意”；其次，将“龠”与“|e”、“箫”、“篪”、“{簟薄ⅰ肮堋蔽逯种窭嗬制鹘卸哉仗致郏贸觥皘e”、“箫”、“篪”为“龠”系乐器，“{簟蔽皘e”之南音，是与“篪”的形制相类似的横吹按孔单管乐器，而“管”为吹类乐器之总名，为竹类乐器之“形”的结论。
[Abstract]:This article takes the musical instruments in the Book of songs as the research object. The specific research ideas are as follows: based on the original Code of Poems, through the investigation and study of the instruments in the literature of classics, the material of unearthed cultural relics, the literature of A, Jin, the ancient characters and the modern research, etc., In this paper, the author has done the following work: 1, combed the literature and materials of the scholars in the Book of Poems on musical instruments in the Book of Poetry, summed up the origin and evolution of the musical instruments in the Book of Poetry, and discussed the solid and initial forms of several musical instruments in the Book of Poetry. In particular, the relationship between Yue and other bamboo wind instruments is discussed. In a word, this paper is a comprehensive textual research of literature, archaeology and philology against the background of the Book of songs. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, which mainly discusses two problems: the first is a brief introduction to the research background of the Book of songs, the other is to expound the research situation and the main problems of the instrument, and to put forward the three main problems to be discussed in this paper. The second chapter is "Ying" and "Tian" in "Yingtian County Drum", with emphasis on "Tian". First of all, the history of "Tian" is combed, starting with Mao, Zheng's differences and bases; Zheng's syndrome differentiation; Maoist scholars' differentiation; non-Mao non-Zheng scholars' views and dialectics; It is pointed out that "Tian" should be related to building drum. Secondly, based on the analysis of the shape and significance of the building drum discovered by archaeology, it is concluded that "Tian" is a large drum, that is, a drum, which has the function of "communicating with God" and communicates with heaven. "Ying" is a small drum, hanging on both sides of "Tian" conclusion. The third chapter is the textual research of "Ya, Nan, e" in the Book of songs, "south of Eya, not arrowhead". This chapter is divided into two aspects: first, according to the "Book of songs" research time division, from the Han Dynasty scholars, Song Dynasty scholars, Qing Dynasty scholars of the three parts of the "elegant", "South", "e" ancient documents were reviewed; The second is to investigate the ancient script of Nan. Guo Moruo regards it as an instrument, Tang Lan regards it as a clay ware, and Chen Zhi thinks it is a bamboo ware. Through the comparison of the above theories, the conclusion is drawn that "Nan" is a musical instrument made of bamboo in primitive society, replaced by earthen instruments in the Stone Age, and developed into instruments such as bronze products in the Bronze Age. Therefore, this article thinks that "Ya" and "Nan" are musical names, and "e" and Yannan are in harmony with the rhythm of Zhong Pan. Chapter four is the textual research of bamboo instruments in the Book of songs. First of all, according to the interpretation of "Yue" by Jia Wen and Jin Wen, it is considered as the earliest single wind instrument with oblique blowing, and the solid form is the one unearthed from Jiahu, that is, "Jia Hu ancient Yue", and then becomes the signifier, which is the "meaning" of bamboo instruments; secondly, it is the "meaning" of bamboo instruments. "Yue" and "e", "Xiao", "echi", "{bad" Lu Lu is difficult to breed the Uighur? What is it? Trade gong "," Xiao "," echi "for" Yue "is a musical instrument," {mat? The Nanyin of "Li e" is the conclusion that the shape of "echi" is similar to that of "echi", and that the "tube" is the total name of the blowing instrument and the "shape" of the bamboo instrument.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：J609.2

【引证文献】