有氧运动为主综合训练方式对轻度认知障碍的干预作用研究
本文关键词:有氧运动为主综合训练方式对轻度认知障碍的干预作用研究 出处:《南京医科大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
更多相关文章: 有氧运动 轻度认知障碍 认知功能 生活质量 运动功能
【摘要】:背景:轻度认知障碍(Mild cognitive impairment,MCI)是正常老年人和老年痴呆的中间过渡阶段,其发病率和患病率在逐年增加,并且MCI与老年痴呆(Alzheimer's Disease, AD)的高发病率密切相关。目前已有研究指出中等强度的有氧运动可能减缓MCI的发生。目的:本研究旨在观察有氧运动为主的综合训练方式对轻度认知障碍患者认知功能和生活质量的作用,为有氧运动在MCI老年人群推广提供依据。方法:将60名MCI患者按照随机数字表法随机分为运动组和对照组,其中运动组29名,对照组31名。运动组接受中等强度运动强度(心电运动试验中最大心率的60-80%),35分钟/次,3次/周,完成持续3个月的节奏感强的音乐引导下的有氧操;对照组仅接受健康宣教,未进行任何干预。在3个月的干预结束后,所有受试者接受为期3个月的随访观察。所有受试者在干预前、3月干预结束时、6月随访时均接受认知功能、生活质量以及运动功能等的评估。认知功能评估采用简明精神状态评分(Minimum Mental State Examination,MMSE)、北京版蒙特利尔认知评估(Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA)Beijing version)、韦氏逻辑记忆测试、韦氏数字广度测试、连线测试-A、连线测试-B、符号数字模式测试以及事件相关电位P300检查;活动能力采用社会功能活动问卷(Functional Activities Questionnaire, FAQ)评估日常生活独立能力,中文版简明健康状况调查表(SF-36)评估生活质量,老年抑郁量表评估心理状态,运动能力方面采用用Berg平衡功能量表、心电运动试验的两项乘积(rate pressure product, RPP).最大代谢当量(metablic equivalent, METs)及运动中最大心率(max heart rate, HRmax)指标进行评估。结果:3个月的干预完成时共58名受试者完成所有功能评估(运动组27名,对照组31名),6月随访时54名受试者完成功能评估(运动组27名、对照组27名)。治疗前两组受试者在年龄、性别、受教育程度以及MMSE评分等方面,差异无统计学意义(P0.05),具有可比性。1、认知功能的变化比较:3个月的运动干预后,运动组MMSE评分为(28.0±1.3)分、MoCA评分为(24.7±-2.2)分、韦氏逻辑记忆测试评分为(17.5±3.8)分、连线测试-A为(66.2±24.5)秒、连线测试-B为(158.3+48.7)秒、符号数字模式测试评分为(35.6±8.8)分、事件相关电位P300潜伏期为(423.6±±40.2)ms,与干预前相比均有统计学意义(p0.05),其中韦氏逻辑记忆测试、连线测试-B与对照组相比差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。6月随访时运动组韦氏逻辑记忆评分为(16.7±±6.3)分、连线测试-A为(59.6±±19.5)秒、符号数字模式测试评分为(37.1±±8.7)分与干预前相比,差异有统计学意义(p0.05),且对照组韦氏数字广度测试评分(15.9±3.0)分、符号数字模式测(35.2±12.6)分、P300潜伏期为(444.9±-23.4)ms较干预前相比差异有统计学意义(p0.05),并且对照组P300潜伏期与运动组相比差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。2、活动能力、生活质量以及心理状态的变化比较:FAQ评分在3月、6月时进行组内和组间比较差异均无统计学意义。6月随访时运动组SF-36评分为(114.6+17.8)分,与干预前(107.8±16.7)分相比差异有统计学意义(P(0.05)。对照组3月老年抑郁评分为(11.2±±6.0)分、6月评分为(11.2±±6.7)分与干预前(14.5±±6.9)分相比差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。3、运动功能的变化比较:3月干预后,运动组Berg平衡功能量表评分为(55.5±±0.8)分与干预前和对照组比较差异有统计学意义。6月随访时运动组SF-36评分为(114.6±±17.8)分与干预前相比差异有统计学意义,运动组Berg平衡功能量表评分为(55.5±±1.0)分与对照组相比差异有统计学意义。3个月的干预后,运动组和对照组心电运动试验相关指标的变化均无统计学意义,6个月随访时运动组METs为(9.2±±2.2)和对照组METs为(9.9±±1.9)与干预前相比差异有统计学意义,6月随访时对照组最大心率为(148.8±19.4)次/人与干预前相比差异有统计学意义。4、多元线性回归分析:3月干预后,MCI患者韦氏逻辑记忆测试、连线测试-B、Berg平衡功能的改善与运动干预有显著相关性(p0.05)。MMSE评分和MCI患者的年龄、性别等密切相关,年龄越大,治疗后增加的分值越小;同时,女性患者治疗后增加的分值较男性小。FAQ的分值和年龄呈正相关,年龄越大,FAQ增大的分值越大。SF-36的分值和年龄呈现负相关,年龄越大,训练后SF-36的分值增加越小。6月随访时运动组MCI患者韦氏逻辑记忆、P300潜伏期、Berg平衡功能改善与运动干预有显著相关性(p0.05),并且结果提示年龄越小MCI患者韦氏逻辑记忆改善越明显。结论:研究结果显示通过对MCI患者进行中等强度(60-80%的最大心率),3次/周,35分钟/次,持续3个月的有氧运动操干预及持续3个月的随访观察,证实有氧运动操可以提高MCI患者认知功能,改善其生活质量。
[Abstract]:Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is the intermediate transition stage between the normal elderly and the senile dementia. Its incidence and prevalence are increasing year by year, and MCI is closely related to the high incidence of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). At present, studies have shown that moderate aerobic exercise may slow the occurrence of MCI. Objective: the purpose of this study is to observe the effect of aerobic exercise based comprehensive training on cognitive function and quality of life in patients with mild cognitive impairment, so as to provide evidence for the promotion of aerobic exercise in the elderly in MCI. Methods: 60 MCI patients were randomly divided into the exercise group and the control group according to the random number table method, of which 29 were in the exercise group and 31 in the control group. The exercise group received moderate intensity exercise intensity (60-80% of maximal heart rate in ECG exercise test), 35 minutes / time, 3 times / week, completed 3 months' aerobic exercise guided by rhythmic music, while the control group only received health education without any intervention. After 3 months of intervention, all the subjects were followed up for a period of 3 months. All subjects received assessment of cognitive function, quality of life, and motor function during the intervention, the end of intervention in March, and the follow-up of June. The cognitive function was assessed by mini mental state score (Minimum Mental, State Examination, MMSE), the Beijing version of the Montreal cognitive assessment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment Beijing (MoCA) version), logical memory test and Wechsler digit span test, Lian Xiance test, -A -B connection test and digital symbol mode test and event related potential P300 activity; the functional activities questionnaire (Functional Activities Questionnaire, FAQ) evaluation of independent ability of daily living, health status questionnaire version of Chinese (SF-36) quality of life assessment, geriatric depression scale to assess the psychological status, exercise capacity by two, the product table ECG exercise test with Berg balance amount (rate pressure product, RPP) the maximum metabolic equivalent (metablic equivalent METs) maximum heart rate and movement (max heart rate, HRmax) The index is evaluated. Results: a total of 58 subjects completed all the functional evaluations (27 in the exercise group and 31 in the control group) at the completion of the 3 month intervention. In June, 54 subjects completed the functional assessment (27 in the exercise group and 27 in the control group). There was no significant difference in age, sex, education and MMSE scores between the two groups before treatment (P0.05), which was comparable. Comparison of changes in cognitive function: 1, 3 months of exercise intervention, exercise group MMSE score was (28 + 1.3) and MoCA was (24.7 + -2.2), logical memory test scores for Webster (17.5 + 3.8) points, -A connection test (66.2 + 24.5) seconds, connection test -B (158.3+48.7) and digital symbol test mode second score (35.6 + 8.8) and event related potential P300 latency (423.6 + 40.2) ms, there were statistically significant differences before and after the intervention (P0.05), which compared the logical memory test and Wechsler connection test -B and the control group was statistically significant (P0.05). June follow-up exercise group Wechsler logical memory score (16.7 + 6.3) points, -A connection test (59.6 + + 19.5 seconds) and digital symbol mode test score (37.1 + 8.7) compared with before intervention, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05), the control group and the digit span test score (15.9 + 3), symbol digit (35.2 + 12.6) model test, the latency of P300 was (444.9 + -23.4) ms was statistically significant difference compared with before intervention (P0.05) and the control group, the latency of P300 and exercise group had significant difference (P0.05). 2, comparison of activity ability, quality of life and mental state: there was no significant difference in FAQ score between group and group in March and June. In June, the SF-36 score of the exercise group was (114.6+17.8) score, and the difference was statistically significant (P (0.05) before the intervention (107.8 + 16.7). In the control group, the geriatric depression score in March was (11.2 + 6), and the score in June was (11.2 + 6.7), which was significantly different from that before intervention (14.5 + + 6.9). The difference was statistically significant (P0.05). 3, the comparison of motor function changes: in March, the score of Berg balance function scale of exercise group was (55.5 + 0.8) after intervention, and the difference was statistically significant compared with that before intervention. In June follow-up, the SF-36 score of exercise group was (114.6 + 17.8), and the difference was statistically significant compared with that before intervention. The score of Berg balance function scale in exercise group was (55.5 + 1), which was significantly different from that in control group. 3 months after the intervention, changes in exercise group and control group electrocardiogram exercise test indexes were not statistically significant, 6 months follow-up exercise group (9.2 + METs + 2.2) and control group (9.9 + METs + 1.9) was statistically significant difference between before and after intervention, the control group were followed up in June the maximum heart rate (148.8 + 19.4) times per person compared with before intervention the difference was statistically significant. 4, multiple linear regression analysis: in March, after the intervention, there was a significant correlation between the improvement of Wechsler logical memory test, the connection test -B and Berg balance function in MCI patients and the exercise intervention (P0.05). The MMSE score is closely related to the age and gender of MCI patients. The larger the age, the smaller the increase score after treatment. At the same time, the increase score of female patients is smaller than that of males. The score of FAQ is positively correlated with age, and the larger the age is, the greater the score of FAQ increases. The score of SF-36 has a negative correlation with age, and the older the age is, the increase in the score of SF-36 is smaller after training. During June follow-up, there was a significant correlation between the improvement of Wechsler logical memory, P300 latency and Berg balance function in exercise group MCI and exercise intervention (P0.05), and the results showed that the smaller the age was, the more obvious the improvement of Wechsler logical memory in MCI patients. Conclusion: the results showed moderate intensity (maximum heart rate of 60-80%) in MCI patients.
【学位授予单位】:南京医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R749.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵永波;轻度认知障碍及其进展[J];河南大学学报(医学版);2005年02期
2 范云泽;房伟;张强;;对轻度认知障碍预警及干预的临床意义[J];医学综述;2008年13期
3 崔其福;赵艳茹;;轻度认知障碍研究进展[J];赤峰学院学报(自然科学版);2008年S1期
4 尹昌浩;郭艳芹;韩璎;;轻度认知障碍的研究进展[J];医学研究生学报;2012年09期
5 宋守君;;轻度认知障碍的研究进展[J];国外医学(老年医学分册);2001年04期
6 方芳,晏勇;轻度认知障碍的研究进展[J];重庆医学;2004年06期
7 熊光润,陈静,王虹敏,顾昱,熊芳琴,冯玲,谭晓敏,王静;轻度认知障碍患者情感图片再认的研究[J];神经疾病与精神卫生;2004年03期
8 赵永波,周晓琳;轻度认知障碍[J];神经疾病与精神卫生;2004年05期
9 马立华;;轻度认知障碍研究现状[J];中国医学文摘.内科学;2004年01期
10 刘彬,韶红,彭永革,丁惠莹;对深圳罗湖区老年人轻度认知障碍的调查与分析[J];广州中医药大学学报;2005年05期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 赵永波;周晓琳;;轻度认知障碍[A];中华医学会第七次全国神经病学学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年
2 赵永波;周晓琳;;轻度认知障碍[A];第七届全国老年医学学术会议暨海内外华人老年医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年
3 赵永波;周晓琳;;轻度认知障碍概念及进展[A];2005年中国神经心理学学术会议论文集[C];2005年
4 陈皓;洪楠;;磁共振扩散张量成像对轻度认知障碍的初步研究[A];中华医学会第十三届全国放射学大会论文汇编(下册)[C];2006年
5 高芳;张允岭;韩振蕴;侯小兵;金香兰;陈宝鑫;何婷婷;;血管源性轻度认知障碍认知损害特点分析[A];中医药中青年科技创新与成果展示论坛论文集[C];2009年
6 高芳;张允岭;韩振蕴;侯小兵;金香兰;陈宝鑫;何婷婷;;血管源性轻度认知障碍认知损害特点分析[A];自主创新与持续增长第十一届中国科协年会论文集(3)[C];2009年
7 陈怀红;;轻度认知障碍的现代概念和研究进展[A];2005年浙江省老年医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2005年
8 何迎春;张如富;;轻度认知障碍的中医辨证分型[A];浙江省中西医结合学会神经内科专业委员会第五次学术研讨会中西医结合神经内科学习班资料汇编[C];2006年
9 王健;林水淼;;从“心”论治轻度认知障碍的思考[A];第十次中医药防治老年病学术交流会论文集[C];2012年
10 于华林;詹向红;;近10年轻度认知障碍研究进展[A];2013年全国老年性痴呆与相关疾病学术会议论文汇编[C];2013年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 指导专家 上海交通大学医学院附属精神卫生中心精神科 张毅 副主任医师 王子扬;老人谨防轻度认知障碍发展成老年痴呆[N];上海中医药报;2013年
2 中华医学会神经病学分会主任委员 贾建平;轻度认知障碍 需尽早诊治[N];健康报;2011年
3 李 浩 刘 芳 徐立然 侯留法 崔 玲 罗增刚;还脑益聪胶囊对老年轻度认知障碍的影响[N];中国中医药报;2004年
4 刘鹏;美研究显示:较之女性,男性更易“健忘”[N];新华每日电讯;2008年
5 ;老翁更健忘,但学问大忘性小[N];新华每日电讯;2010年
6 本报记者 聂国春;轻度认知障碍是老年痴呆最佳治疗时机[N];中国消费者报;2009年
7 褚晓明;轻度认知障碍者是老年痴呆高危人群[N];健康报;2005年
8 通讯员褚晓明;拿起电话筒 家中诊痴呆[N];科技日报;2002年
9 王增;经常焦虑忧郁易患失忆症[N];卫生与生活报;2007年
10 吕乃群;叶酸可控制轻度认知障碍[N];卫生与生活报;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 赵春善;轻度认知障碍老年人认知功能干预模式的构建及其干预效果评价[D];延边大学;2016年
2 张耀东;老年轻度认知障碍的现状调查、危险因素及早期干预研究[D];苏州大学;2011年
3 黄觉斌;自然人群中老年人轻度认知障碍的随访研究[D];中国协和医科大学;2002年
4 姚志军;轻度认知障碍和阿尔兹海默病脑形态异常的磁共振影像研究[D];兰州大学;2011年
5 尹昌浩;两种类型轻度认知功能障碍患者的多模态核磁共振研究[D];吉林大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 张兰;石河子老年轻度认知障碍影响因素的分析[D];石河子大学;2015年
2 甄淑芳;轻度认知障碍患者早年创伤事件和事件相关电位的研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年
3 李彦明;血脂和甲状腺激素水平对轻度认知障碍筛查和早期诊断的临床意义[D];河北医科大学;2015年
4 马旭;面向轻度认知障碍的神经影像建模方法研究[D];兰州大学;2015年
5 景静;记忆训练对遗忘型轻度认知障碍老年人记忆力的影响[D];北京协和医学院;2013年
6 王品;RAGE Gly82Ser基因多态性及血清sRAGE水平与2型糖尿病相关轻度认知障碍相关性研究[D];东南大学;2015年
7 彭星铭;加减薯蓣丸对轻度认知障碍的早期临床干预及相关量效关系实验的研究[D];湖北中医药大学;2015年
8 游彦慧;西宁地区缺血性脑小血管病轻度认知障碍影响因素分析[D];青海大学;2016年
9 苗薇;轻度认知障碍老年群体产品设计研究[D];北京理工大学;2015年
10 李东倩;太原市养老机构轻度认知障碍老年人中医调摄护理研究[D];山西医科大学;2016年
,本文编号:1342743
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/jsb/1342743.html