布朗信念评估量表中文版在强迫症患者中的信度和效度

发布时间：2018-03-26 08:22

本文选题：布朗信念评估量表　切入点：信度　出处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2016年01期

【摘要】：目的:评价布朗信念评估量表(BABS)中文版在中国强迫症患者中的信度和效度。方法:204名强迫症患者完成BABS中文版、耶鲁布朗强迫量表、贝克抑郁量表和状态特质焦虑问卷。结果:BABS中文版在强迫症患者中的α系数为0.80;评分者一致性信度系数为0.93(P0.01),重测信度为0.71(P0.01);量表总分与强迫症状严重程度、抑郁和焦虑程度相关不显著,与耶鲁布朗强迫量表辅助条目中的自知力条目得分相关显著0.70(P0.01);对BABS的单因子模型进行验证性因素分析显示,χ~2/df=2.195,CFI=0.970,IFI=0.971,TLI=0.956,GFI=0.960,RMSEA=0.077。结论:BABS中文版在中国强迫症患者中具有良好的信度和效度,可以用于评估强迫症患者的自知力水平。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Brown belief Assessment scale (Babs) in Chinese obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. Results the 伪 coefficient of the Chinese version of the: BABS was 0.80 in the patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), the reliability coefficient of consistency was 0.93%, the reliability of test-retest was 0.71% (P 0.01), the total score of the scale and the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCD). There was no significant correlation between depression and anxiety, There was a significant correlation between the scores of insight items in the supplementary items of Yale Brown obsessive-compulsive scale and the scores of 0.70 and P0.01in the supplementary items of the Yale Brown obsessive-compulsive scale, and a confirmatory factor analysis on the single factor model of BABS showed that 蠂 ~ 2 / dfg ~ (2.195) ~ (2.195) CFI ~ (0.970) I ~ (0.971) ~ (0.971) ~ (0.956) ~ (?) GFI _ (0.96) RMSEA0.0770.Conclusion the Chinese version of "W-BBs" has good reliability and validity in Chinese patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It can be used to assess the level of awareness in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
【作者单位】：中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理学研究所;湖南农业大学教育学院;西南民族大学社会学与心理学学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金青年项目(项目号:81401128)
【分类号】：R749.7

【相似文献】