焦虑个体对威胁性信息的注意偏向训练

发布时间：2018-05-30 02:31

本文选题：焦虑 + 注意偏向　；参考：《中国心理卫生杂志》2014年05期

【摘要】：目的:考察注意偏向训练矫正焦虑个体对威胁性信息注意偏向的作用。方法:招募在校大学生,根据状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)、社交焦虑量表(LSAS)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)得分和注意偏向值(BIAS)相匹配的原则,选取BIAS10的焦虑组受试,将其分为注意偏向训练组(n=10)和无偏向重复练习组(n=10),对两组进行每天1次,连续7 d的训练。采用空间线索范式,2(组别:注意偏向训练组,无偏向重复练习组)×2(时间:前测,后测)混合设计,以面孔表情图片为材料,比较两组受试训练前后的注意偏向差异。设置迁移任务,以面孔表情图片和词语为材料,考察注意偏向训练效果的可迁移性。结果:训练后,注意偏向训练组对负性面孔的BIAS标准分数低于训练前[(-1.07±1.38)vs.(0.60±0.45),P0.05],无偏向重复练习组对负性面孔的BIAS标准分数也低于训练前[(-0.04±0.37)vs.(0.52±0.34),P0.05]。重复测量方差分析表明,词语任务的时间主效应、分组主效应以及时间×分组交互作用均无统计学意义。结论:注意偏向训练和无偏向重复练习都能降低受试对负性表情面孔的注意偏向。一组负性表情面孔的训练效果能够迁移到另外一组面孔刺激上,但不能从图片迁移到词语上。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the effect of attention bias training on threatening information attention bias. Methods: according to the matching principle of status-trait anxiety scale (STAI), social anxiety scale (SSA), Beck depression scale (BAD) and attention bias (BIAS), the anxiety group of BIAS10 was selected. The two groups were divided into two groups: attention bias training group (n = 10) and no bias repeated training group (n = 10). The two groups were trained once a day for 7 consecutive days. The spatial cues paradigm (group: attention bias training group, no bias repeat exercise group) 脳 2 (time: pre test, post test) design was used to compare the difference of attention bias between the two groups before and after training with facial expression pictures as materials. The transfer task was set up and the transferability of attention bias training effect was investigated using facial expression pictures and words as materials. Results: after training, the standard score of BIAS for negative faces in attention bias training group was lower than that before training [-1.07 卤1.38)vs.(0.60 卤0.45 p0.05], and the BIAS standard score for negative faces in non-bias repeated training group was also lower than that before training [-0.04 卤0.37)vs.(0.52 卤0.34 (P0.05)]. The analysis of variance of repeated measurement showed that there was no significant difference in the temporal principal effect, grouping main effect and time 脳 grouping interaction of word tasks. Conclusion: both attentional bias training and non-bias repetition training can decrease the attentional bias of negative facial expressions. The training effect of one group of negative expression faces can be transferred to another group of faces, but not from pictures to words.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学心理学院;北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(31271083) 国家重点基础研究计划(973项目)(2011CB711000)
【分类号】：R749.7

【参考文献】