湖南科技学院大学生抑郁症状及其影响因素分析

发布时间：2018-06-12 09:28

本文选题：抑郁 + 影响因素　；参考：《卫生研究》2014年03期

【摘要】：目的了解大学生的抑郁状况并探讨其影响因素。方法采用抑郁自评量表(CES-D)、青少年自评生活事件量表(ASLEC)、特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)进行调查,以湖南科技学院在校全日制本科生为调查对象,以班级为单位,采用年级分层整群抽取,对一般情况、抑郁症状、生活事件、应对方式等进行调查。结果被试大学生肯定有抑郁症状的为25.00%;不同性别、不同年级学生的抑郁均分比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。专业满意度不同的学生抑郁均分比较差异有统计学意义(P0.001);有抑郁症状大学生的生活事件应激强度明显高于无抑郁症状者(P0.001),二者间应对方式均分比较差异有统计学意义(P0.001)。有抑郁症状大学生的积极应对较少而消极应对倾向大。性别、专业、成长环境及年级对大学生抑郁症状检出率的影响组间比较无统计学意义;对专业满意较不满意者、就业前景不好较前景好者、非学生干部较干部者、健康状况差较健康状况好者、体育锻炼1次/周较3次者、家庭经济不好较条件好者、父母期望高较期望低者、恋爱较未恋爱者的抑郁状况检出率要高,各组间比较有统计学意义(χ2=10.129,P=0.006;χ2=47.128,P0.001;χ2=5.873,P=0.015;χ2=35.343,P0.001;χ2=16.678,P0.001;χ2=15.805,P0.001;χ2=22.408,P0.001;χ2=7.044,P=0.008)。多因素分析结果显示:体育锻炼1次/周、家庭经济不好、健康状况差、就业前景不好、恋爱、父母期望值高的学生更易发生抑郁。结论体育锻炼、家庭经济、健康状况、就业前景、是否恋爱、父母期望是大学生抑郁的重要影响因素。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the depression status of college students and its influencing factors. Methods Self-rating Depression scale (CES-DX), Self-Rating Life events scale (ASLECG) and trait coping style questionnaire (TCSQ) were used to investigate the students of Hunan University of Science and Technology. Investigate general conditions, depressive symptoms, life events, coping styles, etc. Results there was no significant difference in the mean score of depression between different genders and different grades (P 0.05). There were significant differences in the mean scores of depression among students with different degree of professional satisfaction (P 0.001), and the stress intensity of life events in students with depression symptoms was significantly higher than that in students without depression symptoms (P 0.001), and there was a significant difference in the mean scores of coping styles between the two groups (P 0.001). College students with depressive symptoms have less positive coping and greater negative coping tendency. The influence of gender, major, growth environment and grade on the prevalence rate of depression symptoms of college students was not statistically significant; those who were not satisfied with their major, those with poor employment prospects, those with higher employment prospects, those with non-student cadres than with cadres, and those with less satisfaction with their major, and those with better employment prospects, had no statistical significance. The poor health condition was better than the healthy condition, the physical exercise once a week was better than the 3 times, the family economy was not good, the parents' expectation was higher than the low expectation, and the rate of depression in love was higher than that in the unloved one. There were statistically significant differences among the groups (蠂 ~ 2 ~ (2) = 10.129) P ~ (0.006); 蠂 ~ (2 +) 47.128 (P 0.001); 蠂 ~ (2) ~ 2 ~ 2 ~ (5.873) P ~ (0.015); 蠂 ~ (2) ~ 2 ~ (2) ~ (5) -843 (P ~ (0.001); 蠂 ~ (2) ~ 2 ~ 2 ~ (2) ~ (16) 778 (P ~ (0.001); 蠂 ~ (2) ~ 2 ~ (2) (15.805) (P ~ (0.001); 蠂 ~ (22) 22. 408 (P ~ 0.001); The results of multivariate analysis showed that students with poor family economy, poor health, poor employment prospects, love and high parental expectations were more likely to suffer from depression. Conclusion physical exercise, family economy, health status, employment prospect, love or not, parents' expectation are important influencing factors of college students' depression.
【作者单位】：湖南科技学院数学与计算科学系;
【分类号】：R749.4

【参考文献】