大五人格量表神经质分量表全式与简式的信效度比较

发布时间：2018-06-26 12:50

本文选题：神经质 + 大五人格　；参考：《中国临床心理学杂志》2017年03期

【摘要】：目的:比较大五人格量表(NEO Personality Inventory Revised,NEO-PI-R)神经质分量表(全式)和大五人格量表简版(NEO Five Factor Inventory,NEO-FFI)神经质分量表(简式)的信效度,并分别考察其跨性别测量等值性。方法:共有5352名在校大学生完成了神经质分量表全式和简式,以及流调中心用抑郁量表。考察量表的内部一致性,并采用Amos软件进行验证性因素分析以考察量表的构想效度和跨性别测量等值性。结果:神经质分量表全式的信度(Cronbach’sα=0.92,MIC=0.20)以及效度指标(GFI=0.93,CFI=0.91,RMSEA=0.056)均达到标准,并且在男女群组上严格等值(△CFI0.01)。简式也表现出良好的信度(Cronbach’sα=0.84,MIC=0.31)和效度(GFI=0.96,CFI=0.93,RMSEA=0.067),但在男女群组上只实现部分等值性(严格等值模型中△CFI0.01)。结论:神经质分量表全式和简式均具有良好的信效度,但是全式呈现出更好的跨性别测量等值性。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the reliability and validity of the neo Personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) neuroticism scale and the neo five Factor inventory (NEO-FFI) neuroticism scale. Methods: a total of 5352 college students completed the neuroticism scale and the depression scale. The internal consistency of the scale was investigated, and the confirmatory factor analysis was carried out with Amos software to investigate the validity of the scale and the transgender equivalence. Results: the complete reliability (Cronbachs 伪 0.92MIC0.20) and the validity index (GFI0.93) of neuroticism scale (Cronbachs 伪 0.92MIC0.20) reached the standard of 0.91% RMSEAA 0.056, and were strictly equivalent in male and female groups (CFI0.01). The simplified formula also showed good reliability (Cronbachs 伪 0.84MIC0.31) and validity (GFI0.96CFI0.93RMSEAA 0.067), but only partial equivalence was achieved in male and female groups (CFI0.01 in strict equivalence model). Conclusion: neuroticism scale has good reliability and validity, but it has better transgender equivalence.
【作者单位】：中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理中心;华南师范大学心理学院心理应用研究中心;湖南农业大学科学技术师范学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金(81370034)
【分类号】：R749

【相似文献】