当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 精神病论文 >

大学生攻击行为与父母教养方式、个人防御方式及相关因素研究

发布时间:2018-08-22 18:56
【摘要】:目的:攻击行为对个人生命安全及社会的和谐造成严重的危害。随着社会文明的发展,我们对攻击行为越来越关注,攻击行为被广泛的研究。本研究选择在校大学生为研究对象,旨在探讨父母养育方式、个人防御方式及其相关因素对攻击行为的影响,从而为改善父母养育方式,培养成年人健全人格提供理论依据,为减少社会危害行为的发生,创建和谐社会提供帮助。 方法:对山东省财经大学新入校的大学生按照整群抽样原则抽取人数350人,采用家庭教养方式量表、自身防御量表及BIS-Ⅱ量表进行问卷调查。将上述问卷在课堂上发给学生不记名填写,完成后在教师的协助下统一收回。将调查数据核查检错后输入计算机,通过SPSS19.0统计软件采用T检验、方差分析、pearson相关分析及多元逐步回归分析方法对资料进行统计描述和统计分析。 结果: 1.农村和城市出生的大学生在冲动量表各维度及冲动量表总分数上无明显差异。男生与女生在冲动量表各维度及冲动量表总分数上无明显差异。 2.独生子女与非独生子女,父母抚养长大与单亲家庭抚养长大的大学生在冲动量表各维度上有所差异,家庭经济情况不同和家庭关系状况不同的大学生在冲动量表各维度上有所差异,并且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。 3.父母教养方式量表中父母情感温暖、理解与注意力冲动性因子、运动冲动性因子、无计划冲动性因子及冲动量表总分呈负相关(-0.5<r<-0.3,P<0.01)。父母的严厉惩罚、父母的拒绝否认与注意力冲动性因子、运动冲动性因子、无计划冲动性因子及冲动量表总分呈正相关(0.2<r<0.5,P<0.01)。父亲与母亲偏爱因子与运动冲动性因子呈正相关(0.2<r<0.3,P<0.01)。父亲过分保护与无计划冲动性因子分数呈正相关(r=0.32,P<0.01)。其余各维度相关不具有统计学意义。 4.防御方式量表中交往倾向、隔离、投射、被动攻击、抱怨、潜意呈现、分裂、退缩、反作用形成、回避与冲动量表中注意力冲动性因子、运动冲动性因子、无计划冲动性因子及冲动量表总分呈正相关(0.3<r0.7,P<0.01)。否认防御机制与注意力冲动性因子、运动冲动性因子及冲动量表总分呈正相关性(0.2<r<0.4,P<0.01)。幻想防御机制与运动冲动性因子、无计划冲动性因子和冲动量表总分呈正相关性(0.3<r<0.4,P<0.01)。升华防御机制与注意力冲动性因子、运动冲动性因子及冲动量表总分呈负相关性(-0.2<r<-0.1,P<0.01)。幽默防御机制与注意力冲动性因子呈负相关性(1-=-0.207,P<0.01),与运动冲动性因子和冲动量表总分呈正相关性(0.3<r<0.4,P<0.01)。制止防御因子与运动冲动性因子与冲动量表总分数呈正相关性(0.1<r<0-3,P<0.01)。其余各维度相关性不具有统计学意义。 5.对注意力冲动性因子影响的因素依次为投射因子、被动攻击因子和回避因子。其中投射因子和被动攻击因子可以使注意力冲动性增强,回避因子可以使注意力冲动性减弱。对运动冲动性因子影响依次是被动攻击因子、潜意呈现因子、母亲温暖理解、父亲惩罚严厉因子和退缩因子。其中被动攻击因子、潜意呈现因子、父亲惩罚严厉因子和退缩因子可以使运动冲动性增强,而母亲温暖理解可以使运动冲动性减弱。对无计划冲动性因子影响依次是退缩因子、父亲温暖理解因子和母亲拒绝否认因子。其中退缩因子和母亲拒绝否认因子可以使无计划冲动性增强,父亲温暖理解因子可以使无计划冲动性减弱。对总体冲动性影响依次是投射因子、潜意显现因子、母亲温暖理解因子、父亲惩罚严厉因子、退缩因子、被动攻击因子和反作用形成因子。其中投射因子、潜意显现因子、父亲惩罚严厉因子、退缩因子、被动攻击因子可以使冲动性增强,母亲温暖理解和反作用形成可以使冲动性减弱。 结论: 1、居住地和性别不同对大学生冲动攻击行为没有影响。 2、家庭关系不同、家庭经济情况不同、是否为独生子女对大学生冲动攻击行为有很大影响。 3、大学生不同的防御方式特点与大学生冲动攻击行为有相关性。 4、大学生父母教养方式不同与大学生冲动攻击行为有相关性。 5、对冲动性影响依次是投射因子、潜意显现因子、母亲温暖理解因子、父亲惩罚严厉因子、退缩因子、被动攻击因了和反作用形成因子,投射因子、潜意显现因子、父亲惩罚严厉因子、退缩因子、被动攻击因子可以使冲动性增强,母亲温暖理解和反作用形成可以使冲动性减弱。
[Abstract]:With the development of social civilization, more and more attention has been paid to aggressive behavior and aggressive behavior has been widely studied. This study selected college students as the research object to explore parental rearing style, personal defense style and related factors. The impact of attacking behavior can provide theoretical basis for improving parental rearing style and cultivating healthy personality of adults, and help to reduce the occurrence of social harmful behavior and create a harmonious society.
Methods: A total of 350 new students from Shandong University of Finance and Economics were selected according to the principle of cluster sampling. Family rearing style scale, self-defense scale and BIS-II scale were used to conduct a questionnaire survey. After checking the errors, the data were input into the computer and statistically analyzed by SPSS19.0 software using T test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis and multiple stepwise regression analysis.
Result:
1. There was no significant difference in the dimensions of the Impulse Scale and the total scores of the Impulse Scale between rural and urban college students.
2. There are some differences in each dimension of the impulse scale between the only-child and the non-only-child, the students raised by their parents and the single-parent families. The students with different family economic conditions and family relations have some differences in each dimension of the impulse scale, and the difference is statistically significant (P<0.01).
3. There was a negative correlation between parental warmth, comprehension and attention impulsivity, motor impulsivity, unplanned impulsivity and total score of the Parental Rearing Style Scale (-0.5 < R < 0.3, P < 0.01). Father's and mother's preference factors were positively correlated with motor impulsivity factors (0.2 < R < 0.3, P < 0.01). Father's overprotection was positively correlated with unplanned impulsivity factor scores (r = 0.32, P < 0.01).
4. There was a positive correlation between communication tendency, isolation, projection, passive aggression, complaint, subconscious presentation, splitting, withdrawal, reaction formation, avoidance and the total scores of attention impulse, motor impulse, unplanned impulse and impulse scale (0.3 < r0.7, P < 0.01). There was a positive correlation between fantasy defense mechanism and motor impulsivity factor, unplanned impulsivity factor and total score of motor impulsivity scale (0.3 < R < 0.4, P < 0.01). Sublimation defense mechanism and attention impulsivity factor, motor impulsivity factor and impulsivity were positively correlated (0.3 < R < 0.4, P < 0.01). There was a negative correlation between the total score of the table (- 0.2 < R < 0.1, P < 0.01). The humor defense mechanism was negatively correlated with the factors of attention impulse (1 - = - 0.207, P < 0.01), and positively correlated with the factors of motor impulse and the total score of the impulse scale (0.3 < R < 0.4, P < 0.01). 0.1 < R < 0-3, P < 0.01). The correlation between the other dimensions is not statistically significant.
5. Projection factor, passive attack factor and avoidance factor are in turn the influencing factors of attention impulsiveness. Projection factor and passive attack factor can enhance attention impulsiveness, avoidance factor can weaken attention impulsiveness. Among them, passive aggression factor, intentional presentation factor, father punishment severity factor and withdrawal factor can enhance the motor impulsivity, while mother's warm understanding can weaken the motor impulsivity. Among them, withdrawal factor and mother's rejection factor can enhance unplanned impulsiveness, while father's warm understanding factor can weaken unplanned impulsiveness. Projection factor, latent manifestation factor, father punishment severity factor, withdrawal factor, passive aggression factor can enhance impulsivity, mother's warm understanding and reaction formation can weaken impulsivity.
Conclusion:
1, residence and gender have no effect on impulsive behavior of college students.
2. Family relationship and family economic situation are different. Whether they are only children has a great influence on College Students'impulsive aggressive behavior.
3, the different defense styles of college students are related to impulsive aggressive behavior of college students.
4, college students' parental rearing styles are different from college students' impulse behavior.
5. Projection factor, latent manifestation factor, mother's warm understanding factor, father's punishment severity factor, withdrawal factor, passive aggression cause and reaction forming factor, projection factor, latent manifestation factor, father's punishment severity factor, withdrawal factor, passive aggression factor can increase impulsivity, mother's warm understanding factor And counteraction can weaken impulsivity.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:R749.91;G645.5

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 张璐璐;谢斌;;青少年暴力行为的预测和评估[J];法医学杂志;2011年02期

2 刘克礼;;住院精神病人的暴力行为及应付对策[J];国外医学.精神病学分册;1988年03期

3 陈维梅;;关于暴力行为的理论与对策[J];国外医学.精神病学分册;1990年03期

4 路敦跃,张丽杰;防御机制研究进展[J];国外医学.精神病学分册;1992年02期

5 王小平,杨德森,杨春荣,柳振清;精神病人攻击行为预测研究[J];国外医学.精神病学分册;1996年01期

6 王小平;攻击行为的研究进展[J];国外医学.精神病学分册;1995年01期



本文编号:2198010

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/jsb/2198010.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6899f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com