医学生自闭特质分裂型人格障碍与共情的相关性
发布时间：2018-08-24 12:16
【摘要】：目的探讨在正常医学生群体中自闭特质及分裂型人格障碍是否存在共情能力差异,且两者在共情维度上的差异。方法以某医科大学1 040名大学生为对象,使用自闭谱系问卷(AQ)、人际反应指针量表(IRI)和分裂型人格问卷(SPQ)测查自闭特质、分裂型人格、共情能力水平,并分析三者的关系。结果高自闭特质组医学生在观点采择、想象力、同情关怀3个因子上的得分低于低自闭特质组,而在个人痛苦因子上得分高于低自闭特质组,差异均有统计学意义(P值均0.01);分裂型人格高分组医学生在观点采择、同情关怀2个因子上的得分低于低分组,而在个人痛苦因子上得分高于低分组,差异均有统计学意义(P值均0.05)。大学生群体AQ总分以及SPQ总分和IRI总分均呈负相关(P值均0.05)。高自闭特质组与高分裂型人格组在IRI总分及各维度得分上差异均无统计学意义(P值均0.05)。结论自闭特质水平、分裂型人格障碍水平、共情能力三者存在认知相关性,自闭特质与分裂型人格在认知共情和情感共情上无差异。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore whether there is a difference in empathy ability between normal medical students and split personality disorder, and the difference between them in the dimension of empathy. Methods A total of 1 040 college students from a medical university were investigated by (AQ), interpersonal reaction pointer scale (IRI) and split Personality questionnaire (SPQ) by using autoclave pedigree questionnaire (IRI) and split Personality questionnaire (SPQ). The relationship between them was analyzed. Results the medical students in the high autistic trait group had lower scores in the three factors of opinion selection, imagination and sympathy care than those in the low autistic trait group, while the scores in the personal pain factor were higher than those in the low autistic trait group. The difference was statistically significant (P all 0.01), the scores of the two factors of the split personality high score group were lower than those of the low group, but the scores of the personal pain factor were higher than those of the low group, and the scores of the two factors were lower than those of the low group. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The total score of AQ, the total score of SPQ and the total score of IRI were negatively correlated (P < 0. 05). There was no significant difference in the total score of IRI and the score of each dimension between the high autistic trait group and the high split personality group (P < 0. 05). Conclusion there are cognitive correlations among the three factors: the level of autistic trait, the level of split personality disorder and the ability of empathy. There is no difference in cognitive empathy and emotional empathy between autistic trait and split personality.
【作者单位】： 安徽医科大学第一临床医学院;安徽医科大学一附院神经内科;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金重大研究计划项目(91232717)
【分类号】：R749
[Abstract]:Objective to explore whether there is a difference in empathy ability between normal medical students and split personality disorder, and the difference between them in the dimension of empathy. Methods A total of 1 040 college students from a medical university were investigated by (AQ), interpersonal reaction pointer scale (IRI) and split Personality questionnaire (SPQ) by using autoclave pedigree questionnaire (IRI) and split Personality questionnaire (SPQ). The relationship between them was analyzed. Results the medical students in the high autistic trait group had lower scores in the three factors of opinion selection, imagination and sympathy care than those in the low autistic trait group, while the scores in the personal pain factor were higher than those in the low autistic trait group. The difference was statistically significant (P all 0.01), the scores of the two factors of the split personality high score group were lower than those of the low group, but the scores of the personal pain factor were higher than those of the low group, and the scores of the two factors were lower than those of the low group. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The total score of AQ, the total score of SPQ and the total score of IRI were negatively correlated (P < 0. 05). There was no significant difference in the total score of IRI and the score of each dimension between the high autistic trait group and the high split personality group (P < 0. 05). Conclusion there are cognitive correlations among the three factors: the level of autistic trait, the level of split personality disorder and the ability of empathy. There is no difference in cognitive empathy and emotional empathy between autistic trait and split personality.
【作者单位】： 安徽医科大学第一临床医学院;安徽医科大学一附院神经内科;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金重大研究计划项目(91232717)
【分类号】：R749
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 童建明;分裂型人格障碍的研究概况[J];国外医学.精神病学分册;2001年03期
2 唐云翔;张明岛;王继军;;分裂型人格障碍脑电生物学研究[J];上海精神医学;2007年02期
3 王继军;唐云翔;肖泽萍;;精神分裂型人格障碍[J];上海精神医学;2007年03期
4 郭茜;王继军;;分裂型人格障碍脑结构影像的研究进展[J];内科理论与实践;2011年03期
5 陈晓岗;分裂型人格障碍的症状[J];国外医学.精神病学分册;1987年03期
6 李惠;陈增堂;唐云翔;李春波;肖泽萍;殷芳;王继军;;分裂型人格障碍大学生的社会认知功能[J];中国心理卫生杂志;2010年04期
7 孙振晓;;分裂型人格障碍者的脑脊液HVA[J];国外医学.精神病学分册;1993年03期
8 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 许建阳;终日挨骂易使用儿童形成分裂型人格障碍[N];卫生与生活报;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 李晓丹;睾酮与青少年分裂型人格障碍的相关研究[D];大连医科大学;2012年
2 郎_gs，
本文编号：2200791
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/jsb/2200791.html
最近更新
教材专著
