神经症患者不良情绪的表达及矫正方法

发布时间：2018-10-20 07:35

【摘要】：目的探讨神经症患者不良情绪的表达及矫正方法。方法在深度访谈,文献分析,专家论证基础上编制神经症患者不良情绪的表达及矫正方法干预方案。选取200例中老年神经症患者,经过筛查选出其中100例患者随机分为干预组(n=50)及对照组(n=50),干预组除接受常规药物治疗和传统健康宣教外,每周在团体中进行2~3次不良情绪的表达及矫正,时间8 w。对照组在相应的时间进行常规健康宣教。通过情感平衡量表、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、社会支持量表(SSRS)评估两组患者干预前后心理指标的变化。结果干预组8 w后,情感平衡量表得分高于基线分(P0.05),SAS评分、SDS评分低于基线分(P0.05),SSRS评分高于基线分(P0.05)。对照组8 w后未发生显著变化(P0.05)。结论神经症患者不良情绪的表达及矫正方法对患者的情感、抑郁、焦虑情绪,社会支持、生活质量具有改善作用。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the expression and correction of adverse emotions in neurotic patients. Methods on the basis of deep interview, literature analysis and expert argumentation, we worked out the expression of bad emotion in neurotic patients and the intervention scheme of correction methods. Two hundred middle-aged and elderly patients with neurosis were randomly divided into two groups: intervention group (n = 50) and control group (n = 50). In addition to routine drug therapy and traditional health education, 100 patients in the intervention group were randomly divided into two groups: intervention group (n = 50) and control group (n = 50). The expression and correction of bad emotions were conducted 3 times a week in the group for 8 ws. The control group was given routine health education at the corresponding time. The changes of psychological indexes before and after intervention were evaluated by affective balance scale, (SAS), self-rating anxiety scale, (SDS), social support scale and (SSRS). Results after 8 weeks, the scores of affective balance scale were higher than baseline score (P0.05), SAS score, SDS score lower than baseline score (P0.05), SSRS score higher than baseline score (P0.05). There was no significant change in the control group after 8 weeks (P0.05). Conclusion the expression and correction of negative emotions in patients with neurosis can improve their emotion, depression, anxiety, social support and quality of life.
【作者单位】：河北省第六人民医院;天津医科大学;保定市中心血站;
【分类号】：R749.7

【相似文献】